Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean alpha-diversity values, and alpha- and beta-diversity comparisons for the skin and gill microbiota of the different age groups of seabass Dicentrarchus labrax and seabream Sparus aurata (n = 60 per species x age group x tissue)

From: Effects of aging on the skin and gill microbiota of farmed seabass and seabream

 

Seabass

Seabream

Skin

Gill

Skin

Gill

Alpha-diversity

mean values

EJ

LJ

MA

EJ

LJ

MA

J

MA

J

MA

Shannon

3.5 ± 1

4 ± 0.4

3.8 ± 1

3.5 ± 1

3.6 ± 1

3.7 ± 1

3.3 ± 1

3.4 ± 1

2.9 ± 1

3.2 ± 1

PD

20 ± 7

28 ± 11

27 ± 9

19 ± 6

22 ± 8

23 ± 9

19 ± 9

18 ± 8

13 ± 6

15 ± 6

ACE

164 ± 66

239 ± 106

226 ± 83

138 ± 52

159 ± 69

175 ± 73

155 ± 77

145 ± 71

99 ± 49

110 ± 54

Simpson 1-D

18 ± 8

25 ± 8

23 ± 11

20 ± 11

23 ± 10

24 ± 11

15 ± 10

16 ± 9

11 ± 8

14 ± 10

Alpha-diversity comparisons

Overall

EJ vs LJ

LJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

Overall

EJ vs LJ

LJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

J vs MA

J vs MA

Shannon

16 (5−7)

6 (0.001)

2 (0.05)

−3 (0.003)

3 (0.1)

2 (0.1)

−0.2 (0.9)

−2 (0.1)

1 (0.3)

5 (0.03)

PD

23 (3−9)

6 (1−4)

1 (0.6)

−5 (1− 4)

7 (0.002)

2 (0.04)

−1 (0.5)

− 4 (0.001)

1 (0.4)

4 (0.04)

ACE

17 (2−7)

6 (1−4)

1 (0.6)

−5 (1− 4)

9 (0.0003)

2 (0.05)

−2 (0.2)

−4 (0.001)

1 (0.3)

2 (0.2)

Simpson 1-D

13 (7−6)

5 (1−4)

−2 (0.2)

4 (0.002)

2 (0.1)

2 (0.3)

0.4 (0.9)

2 (0.1)

0.1 (0.8)

4 (0.1)

Beta-diversity

comparisons

Overall

EJ vs LJ

LJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

Overall

EJ vs LJ

LJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

EJ vs MA

Unifrac Unweighted

0.04 (9−5)

0.1 (0.001)

0.02 (0.01)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (9−5)

0.04 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.02 (9−5)

0.03 (9−5)

Unifrac Weighted

0.1 (9−5)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (9−5)

0.02 (0.1)

0.02 (0.2)

0.04 (0.01)

0.01 (0.3)

0.04 (9−5)

Bray-Curtis

0.1 (9−5)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.03 (0.02)

0.1 (9−5)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.1 (0.001)

0.02 (0.001)

0.03 (2−4)

  1. Variation in alpha-diversity was assessed using Linear Mixed Effect models, with age groups as a fixed factor and sampling time as a random factor. Differences in beta-diversity were assessed using PERMANOVA. For each linear model effect test (alpha-diversity) we report the F statistic and significance (P value) and for each PERMANOVA test (beta-diversity) we report the R2 statistics and significance (P value). Significant differences are indicated in bold
  2. EJ early juveniles, LJ late juveniles, MA mature adults, J juveniles