Category | What features are important? | Why are these metadata important? |
---|---|---|
1. Metadata | Host diet | Host diet determines the likely amount of fungal contamination, e.g. omnivores should ingest more dietary fungi than carnivores |
 | Niche specialisation | Dietary specialisation determines the potential diversity of fungal contamination, e.g. generalists may ingest a higher diversity of environmental fungi than specialists |
 | Developmental stage | Host diet may change during development, e.g. adult mammals have a higher likelihood of ingesting fungi than neonates (that consume milk) |
 | Season | Both host diet and the type and availability of fungi can change with season |
2. Sampling scheme | Longitudinal sampling | A time series analysis of the gut mycobiota can be used to define a set of core fungal sequence variant (SV) groups (especially in animals whose dietary fungi are seasonally available) |
Spatial sampling | Increasing the spatial extent of sampling can help to identify the core fungal SVs based on frequency of occurrence | |
Time that sample is exposed to the environment | Fungi may rapidly colonise and grow on faeces after defecation (a more prominent risk for non-invasive sampling) | |
Time since sample collection | Time between sample collection and preservation determines the potential for overgrowth of certain fungi | |
Source tracking | Information about fungi that inhabit the host's environment and/or diet can be used to identify the taxa that have the potential to be commonly ingested | |
Negative/positive controls | A diverse community of microbes can be present within the laboratory and the reagents, and contamination of samples by these microbes should be avoided as much as possible to maximise the signal to noise ratio in the data | |
Sterile work | ||
3. Bioinformatic analyses | Positive filter using reference database(s), e.g. Targeted Host Fungi database | Fungal SVs that reside in the digestive systems of other animals are likely also to inhabit wild animal's gut. Note that reference databases are not always correct or up to date. The author(s) must clearly state the version of a database used in their analyses |
 | Filter SVs using fungal traits database(s), e.g. FUNGuild | Fungal SVs that have certain traits or growth forms, e.g. being 'macrofungi', are unlikely to be authentic residents of the gut microbiota |
 | Comparative analysis | Captive and/or laboratory animals often have less opportunities to ingest a diverse community of fungi, and these data may allow the likely ingested fungal SVs to be identified in wild conspecifics |