Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative abundance of family found in experimental groups

From: Weight-loss in obese dogs promotes important shifts in fecal microbiota profile to the extent of resembling microbiota of lean dogs

Family

Treatments

P value

LG

OG

AWL

Mean ± SEM

Mean ± SEM

Mean ± SEM

Lachnospiraceae

0.6 ± 0.01C

3.0 ± 0.03A

1.97 ± 0.02B

 < .0001

Bacteroidaceae

8.3 ± 0.04C

14.9 ± 0.05B

16.25 ± 0.05A

 < .0001

Clostridiaceae

31.9 ± 0.07A

19.8 ± 0.06B

18.27 ± 0.05C

 < .0001

Coriobacteriaceae

0.6 ± 0.02A

0.5 ± 0.01B

0.6 ± 0.01A

0.0005

Enterobacteriaceae

0.2 ± 0.01C

0.7 ± 0.02B

2.3 ± 0.02A

 < .0001

Erysipelotrichaceae

1.8 ± 0.02C

2.1 ± 0.02B

3.0 ± 0.03A

 < .0001

Fusobacteriaceae

9.4 ± 0.04C

22.4 ± 0.06A

14.8 ± 0.05B

 < .0001

Helicobacteraceae

0.2 ± 0.01C

0.6 ± 0.01B

1.0 ± 0.02A

 < .0001

Lachnospiraceae

16.2 ± 0.05C

20.1 ± 0.06B

23.9 ± 0.06A

 < .0001

Peptostreptococcaceae

2.1 ± 0.02B

1.5 ± 0.02C

3.8 ± 0.03A

 < .0001

Prevotellaceae

7.2 ± 0.05A

3.2 ± 0.04C

5.9 ± 0.04B

 < .0001

Ruminococcaceae

3.5 ± 0.03B

5.8 ± 0.03A

2.2 ± 0.02C

 < .0001

Succinivibrionaceae

2.2 ± 0.03A

0.4 ± 0.02C

1.8 ± 0.02B

 < .0001

Turicibacteraceae

1.8 ± 0.02B

0.2 ± 0.01C

2.0 ± 0.02A

 < .0001

Veillonellaceae

2.6 ± 0.02A

2.0 ± 0.02B

2.0 ± 0.02B

 < .0001

[Paraprevotellaceae]

2.5 ± 0.03B

4.8 ± 0.04A

2.6 ± 0.03B

 < .0001

  1. OG: obese group; WLG: weight loss group; LG: lean group
  2. A,B,CMeans followed by different letters differ by 5% in the Tukey test adjusted by PROC GLIMMIX