Skip to main content

Table 1 (A) Brood size before and after manipulation, (B) hatching date across treatments

From: No evidence for associations between brood size, gut microbiome diversity and survival in great tit (Parus major) nestlings

(A)

Brood size

Before manipulation (mean ± SD)

After manipulation (mean ± SD)

 

Enlarged broods (E)

7.700 ± 1.61

9.650 ± 1.309

 

Reduced broods (R)

8.375 ± 1.637

6.375 ± 1.637

 

Control broods (C)

7.565 ± 1.805

7.565 ± 1.805

 

Unmanipulated broods

7.810 ± 2.112

na

 

ANOVA

F3 = 0.987, p = 0.403

(B)

Hatching date

Mean ± SD

 

Enlarged broods (E)

58.60 ± 5.77

 

Reduced broods (R)

59.83 ± 6.41

 

Control broods (C)

58.74 ± 5.34

 

Unmanipulated broods

63.81 ± 4.79

(B)

Tukey’s post-hoc for between-group comparisons

Average hatching date

 

ANOVA

F3 = 3.964, p = 0.011*

 

Contrasts

Estimate

SE

t.ratio

p

 

COU-C

5.070

1.70

2.983

0.019*

 

COU-E

5.210

1.76

2.961

0.020*

 

COU-R

3.976

1.68

2.363

0.092

 

C-E

0.139

1.72

0.081

0.100

 

C-R

− 1.094

1.64

− 0.666

0.910

 

E-R

− 1.233

1.70

− 0.723

0.888

  1. (E) enlarged brood size, (R) reduced brood size, (C) control brood size, (COU) unmanipulated control brood size. Brood size was successfully either reduced or enlarged by two chicks