Skip to main content

Table 4 The relative abundance (%) of bacterial genera (1% at least in one group) of ruminal microbiome of lambs between grass and concentrate groups

From: Integrated rumen microbiome and serum metabolome analysis responses to feed type that contribution to meat quality in lambs

Items

G

C

SEM

P value

Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group

8.64b

14.41a

1.22

0.1135

Prevotella_1

14.00

8.64

1.54

0.0792

F082_unclassified

5.54b

13.70a

1.83

0.0168

Succinivibrio

9.70a

0.98b

2.86

 < 0.0001

Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-002

8.51a

0.57b

1.96

0.0350

WCHB1-41_unclassified

3.44

2.89

0.69

0.7096

Bacteroidales_RF16_group_unclassified

3.12

2.66

0.64

0.7368

Prevotellaceae_UCG-003

2.35

3.30

0.36

0.2064

Muribaculaceae_unclassified

0.76b

3.32a

0.58

0.0193

Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-004

2.29

1.68

0.38

0.4405

Prevotellaceae_UCG-001

1.74

1.91

0.26

0.7595

Fibrobacter

2.29a

1.37b

0.19

0.0089

Christensenellaceae_R-7_group

2.13a

1.13b

0.26

0.0475

Succiniclasticum

1.89

1.35

0.22

0.2398

Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group

0.96b

2.05a

0.25

0.0177

Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group_unclassified

1.45

1.38

0.4

0.9337

Bacteroidetes_unclassified

0.84b

1.72a

0.2

0.0192

Prevotella

1.17

1.36

0.17

0.6144

unclassified

1.00

1.46

0.25

0.3809

Bacteroidales_UCG-001_unclassified

0.83b

1.56a

0.18

0.0421

  1. G, grass group; C, concentrate group. Means with unlike letters within a row differ at P < 0.05; SEM, standard error of the mean
Back to article page

Animal Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-4671