|  | Pairwise comparison statistics2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Day | Diet Comparisons1 | R2 value | Adjusted p value3 |
14 | Â | Â | Â |
 | BMD vs. 0% BSFLM | 0.0462 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.0394 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0539 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0398 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1402 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.0377 | 1.000 |
 | 0% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0835 | 0.270 |
 | 0% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0651 | 1.000 |
 | 0% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.189 | 0.015 |
 | 12.5% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0379 | 1.000 |
 | 12.5% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0366 | 1.000 |
 | 12.5% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1365 | 0.030 |
 | 25% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0227 | 1.000 |
 | 25% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.0888 | 0.180 |
 | 50% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.0682 | 0.840 |
28 | Â | Â | Â |
 | BMD vs. 0% BSFLM | 0.1446 | 0.015 |
 | BMD vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.0472 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0293 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0827 | 0.045 |
 | BMD vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1243 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.1509 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.1358 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.2988 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.3445 | 0.015 |
 | 12.5% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0473 | 1.000 |
 | 12.5% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.1312 | 0.015 |
 | 12.5% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1862 | 0.015 |
 | 25% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0809 | 0.030 |
 | 25% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1270 | 0.015 |
 | 50% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.0823 | 0.075 |
35 | Â | Â | Â |
 | BMD vs. 0% BSFLM | 0.0581 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.0810 | 0.300 |
 | BMD vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0558 | 1.000 |
 | BMD vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.1225 | 0.030 |
 | BMD vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.2998 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 12.5% BSFLM | 0.0509 | 1.0000 |
 | 0% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0609 | 0.855 |
 | 0% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.1680 | 0.015 |
 | 0% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.3223 | 0.015 |
 | 12.5% vs. 25% BSFLM | 0.0320 | 1.0000 |
 | 12.5% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.1008 | 0.075 |
 | 12.5% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.2665 | 0.015 |
 | 25% vs. 50% BSFLM | 0.0971 | 0.060 |
 | 25% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.2744 | 0.015 |
 | 50% vs. 100% BSFLM | 0.1459 | 0.015 |