Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of hay quality and concentrate supplementation on alpha diversity indices along the gastrointestinal tract of calves

From: Dietary carbohydrate sources differently prime the microbial ecosystem but not the epithelial gene expression profile along the complete gut of young calves

 

Treatment

 

P-values

 

Item

MQH1

HQH2

MQH + C3

HQH + C4

SEM5

Hay quality

Concentrate

Hay quality × Concentrate

Reticulum

        

Observed sOTU6

1109a

861b

500c

502c

51.3

0.02

< 0.01

0.02

Shannon

5.31

4.80

3.27

3.23

0.14

0.05

< 0.01

0.10

InvSimpson

57.8a

33.1b

11.5c

9.33c

4.94

0.01

< 0.01

0.03

Fisher’s

238a

171b

84.4c

83.6c

13.0

0.02

< 0.01

0.02

Rumen liquid

        

Observed sOTU

1051

895

570

522

74.0

0.15

< 0.01

0.44

Shannon

4.99

4.80

3.33

3.21

0.17

0.31

< 0.01

0.81

InvSimpson

33.4

32.1

11.7

9.72

5.27

0.74

< 0.01

0.94

Fisher’s

221

178

98.2

89.8

17.4

0.13

< 0.01

0.30

Rumen solid

        

Observed sOTU

1059

880

599

550

74.0

0.12

< 0.01

0.36

Shannon

5.33

4.88

3.37

3.33

0.15

0.09

< 0.01

0.16

InvSimpson

65.1a

39.4b

10.9c

10.4c

3.47

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

Fisher’s

226

174

106

98.6

18.0

0.09

< 0.01

0.20

Abomasum

        

Observed sOTU

1078

895

659

605

80.2

0.16

< 0.01

0.43

Shannon

4.95

4.80

3.42

3.46

0.21

0.81

< 0.01

0.66

InvSimpson

43.8

33.5

10.8

11.4

6.05

0.44

< 0.01

0.38

Fisher’s

220

178

120

107

18.3

0.15

< 0.01

0.45

Duodenum

        

Observed sOTU

1062a

881b

521c

672c

55.4

0.79

< 0.01

0.01

Shannon

5.15

4.67

3.30

3.42

0.20

0.37

< 0.01

0.15

InvSimpson

45.4

31.7

11.4

10.7

18.7

0.33

< 0.01

0.77

Fisher’s

215

176

88.8

119

13.8

0.76

< 0.01

0.20

Jejunum

        

Observed sOTU

1058

896

581

588

73.3

0.31

< 0.01

0.27

Shannon

5.09

4.67

2.64

3.09

0.27

0.96

< 0.01

0.13

InvSimpson

75.2

28.6

5.81

9.00

25.7

0.41

0.10

0.35

Fisher’s

217

175

97.5

99.7

32.6

0.41

< 0.01

0.33

Colon

        

Observed sOTU

1225

980

617

639

72.4

0.14

< 0.01

0.08

Shannon

5.70

5.33

4.21

4.22

0.17

0.31

< 0.01

0.28

InvSimpson

93.8

65.4

25.6

27.6

13.5

0.34

< 0.01

0.28

Fisher’s

279a

204b

112c

117c

17.5

0.06

< 0.01

0.04

  1. 1Medium-quality hay without concentrate supplementation
  2. 2High-quality hay without concentrate supplementation
  3. 3Medium-quality hay with 70% concentrate supplementation (on fresh matter basis)
  4. 4High-quality hay with 70% concentrate supplementation (on fresh matter basis)
  5. 5Standard error of the mean
  6. 6Sub-operational taxonomic unit
  7. Numbers within a row with different superscript letters indicate difference (P < 0.05)