Skip to main content

Microbiome of the Southwestern Atlantic invasive scleractinian coral, Tubastraea tagusensis

Abstract

Background

Commonly known as sun-coral, Tubastraea tagusensis is an azooxanthellate scleractinian coral that successfully invaded the Southwestern Atlantic causing significant seascape changes. Today it is reported to over 3500 km along the Brazilian coast, with several rocky shores displaying high substrate coverage. Apart from its singular invasiveness capacity, the documentation and, therefore, understanding of the role of symbiotic microorganisms in the sun-coral invasion is still scarce. However, in general, the broad and constant relationship between corals and microorganisms led to the development of co-evolution hypotheses. As such, it has been shown that the microbial community responds to environmental factors, adjustment of the holobiont, adapting its microbiome, and improving the hosts’ fitness in a short space of time. Here we describe the microbial community (i.e. Bacteria) associated with sun-coral larvae and adult colonies from a locality displaying a high invasion development.

Results

The usage of high throughput sequencing indicates a great diversity of Bacteria associated with T. tagusensis, with Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Firmicutes corresponding to the majority of the microbiome in all samples. However, T. tagusensis’ microbial core consists of only eight genera for colonies, and, within them, three are also present in the sequenced larvae. Overall, the microbiome from colonies sampled at different depths did not show significant differences. The microbiome of the larvae suggests a partial vertical transfer of the microbial core in this species.

Conclusion

Although diverse, the microbiome core of adult Tubastraea tagusensis is composed of only eight genera, of which three are transferred from the mother colony to their larvae. The remaining bacteria genera are acquired from the seawater, indicating that they might play a role in the host fitness and, therefore, facilitate the sun-coral invasion in the Southwestern Atlantic.

Introduction

During the last decades, rocky shore communities on the Brazilian coast have been severely impacted by the invasive scleractinian corals Tubastraea tagusensis, and T. coccinea [1,2,3,4]. The genus Tubastraea was first recorded in the Southwestern Atlantic on oil platforms in the late 1980’s [5] and, today its distribution extends for more than 3500 km of the Brazilian coast on natural and artificial substrates [1, 6,7,8,9,10,11]. At some localities, these invasive corals nearly saturate the substrate [12], outcompeting native and endemic species [13], and triggering seascape changes [3, 14].

The successful invasion of both species has been related to their fast growth rate, early reproductive age, the year-round release of long-lived clonal larvae, high regenerative capacity, and lack of native competitors/predators [13, 15, 16]. Furthermore, unlike most of their natural distributional range, the majority of the Brazilian invaded localities are mesotrophic, which ultimately provides a more stable food supply needed to maintain azooxanthellate species (i.e. those lacking the symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates).

Less understood, however, is the role of the microbial community in Tubastraea spp. fitness. Overall, scleractinian corals are believed to harbor one of the most complex communities of symbiont microorganisms including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses, which collectively are known as the ‘microbiome’ [17]. Purported to enhance the hosts’ fitness and functioning [17], the coral microbiome is the central part of a widespread hypothesis of co-evolutive processes known as holobiont [18, 19]. Taking into account factors such as location, environmental changes, depth, bleaching, and diseases, the microbiome of more than 30 coral species has already been studied [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Focusing on Bacteria, it is suggested that Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Cyanobacteria are predominant [20] and that their diversity and abundance are linked to biotic and abiotic factors such as seasonality, anthropic impacts, temperature changes, diseases, etc. [20]. Among the explanations for the occurrence of these predominant bacterial phyla in the microbiome, it is put forward that there are species-specific operational taxonomic units (OTUs) resulting from co-evolutionary processes (host and microbiota) and vertical transfer of microbiota [27, 28] that remain associated to the host regardless of environmental condition. Commonly referred to as the “microbial core”, this microbiota is considered crucial to the host health [20]. On the other hand, the fluctuating portion of the microbiota is the result of a manifold of environmental pressures acting on the host [29].

Overall, the symbiotic relationship between eukaryotes and bacteria are not only ubiquitous [27, 30, 31], but a key question within evolutionary studies [32], where the former does not figure as autonomous entities, but rather as holobionts [27, 33, 34]. Such relationships reflect on fitness and adaptation [35], enabling a faster adjustment of the holobiont to environmental changes by adapting its microbiome, ultimately influencing evolution if the latter is transmitted between generations [19, 36].

Although studies focused on understanding the microbiome of corals have increased in the past decade [20, 22, 37,38,39], azooxanthellate scleractinians remain understudied, with only six species analyzed to date: Madrepora oculata [40], Lophelia pertusa [40, 41], Tubastraea coccinea [38, 42], Dendrophyllia sp., Eguchipsammia fistula, and Rhizotrochus typus [43]. Using a metagenomic approach, the present study describes the microbial community of T. tagusensis from an invaded locality in the Southwestern Atlantic, evaluates how depth influences its microbiome, and investigates the hypothesis of vertical transmission of the bacterial core between coral generations (i.e. adult colonies to larvae).

Results

The microbiome of T. tagusensis adults

Despite several attempts, the PCR step was successful for only six colonies of the first sampling (October 9th, 2017) representing two colonies per depth strata (3, 6, and 8 m). The average number of reads per colony was 11,033, ranging from 6190 to 16,864. A total of 32,070 eukaryote reads were identified and removed from subsequent analyses, along with all sequences identified as chloroplasts, mitochondria, and unknown. From the remaining sequences, an average of 1188 bacterial reads per coral sample were identified (Table 1) and classified to the genus level (except for those indicated in Additional file 1: Table S1).

Table 1 Richness indices (RI), Shannon H diversity (SHD), Effective number of species (Neff Shannon/exp. H), Simpson index (D), Effective number of species (Neff/D2/inverse Simpson) based on the total reads found in each sample

Although the total number of bacterial reads from the larval pool was significantly higher (11,459) than that from adult colonies (677–1943), on average, they had similar richness index (RI). However, the number of effective species based on Simpson and Shannon indexes was smaller for the larvae, indicating the dominance of only a few bacterial groups. Among adults, one colony sampled at 3 m and one from 6 m showed the highest effective number of species (ENS) (Shannon Neff = 15.27 and 14.69, Simpson Neff = 5.65 and 6.46, respectively), while the other sampled at 3 m had the lowest ENS values (Shannon Neff = 3.05, Simpson Neff = 1.05). The average ENS detected did not reflect a depth gradient nor interconnection between samples of the same depth (Table 1).

A total of 15 phyla of Bacteria were identified, among which six were present in all adult samples (Table 2). Within these phyla, 236 OTUs were retrieved (Additional file 2: Figure S1 [44]) and corresponded to 167 bacteria identified to genus level, 15 as uncultured, and 81 classified only to a higher level (family, order, class, and phylum), implying uncultured microorganisms. Among all classifications, 30 OTUs are responsible for the largest portion of the microbiome (Fig. 1). Sixteen OTUs (representing ~ 84% of the whole microbial abundance) were recovered in all analyzed colonies, of which eight were classified to the genus rank and correspond to the “microbial core” for the Southwestern Atlantic invasive T. tagusensis (Fig. 2b).

Table 2 Relative frequency of the most common bacterial phyla from samples in relation to sampling depth
Fig. 1
figure1

Average relative frequency of the 30 most abundant associated with the colonies of Tubastraea tagusensis from 3, 6, and 8 m depth. OTU’s in bold represent the core microbiome

Fig. 2
figure2

Bacterial genera shared by different specimens of Tubastraea tagusensis (i.e. colonies sampled at different depths and larvae). a Venn diagram indicating the number of OTUs from T. tagusensis adult colonies per sampling depth and larvae, and the number of genera common to all analyzed samples. b Frequency of each of the eight genera in each sample that make up the microbial core of T. tagusensis, including adults and larvae

The eight bacterial genera that compose the microbial core of T. tagusensis make up only a small portion of the microbiome associated with this coral (3.66, 12.22, and 6% of the whole microbiome from colonies sampled at 3, 6, and 8 m). Overall, no significant differences in the microbial community from colonies sampled at different depths (3, 6, and 8 m - ANOVA) or depth groups (3 and 6 m, 3 and 8 m, and 6 and 8 m, Whites’ non-parametric t-test) were observed. Nevertheless, although T. tagusensis from different depths host a somewhat similar number of OTUs, their frequencies were variable (Fig. 2).

The microbiome of T. tagusensis larvae

Sequencing of the larval pool resulted in 20,921 taxonomic classifications, of which 9465 represented eukaryotes, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and unknown sequences, and the remaining represented bacteria. It was not possible to amplify the mother colony of these larvae with the protocol used. Totaling ten phyla, the diversity of microbes found in the larvae is similar to that observed from adult colonies, albeit at different proportions. Most of the larval microbiome is composed of Bacteroidetes (88.43%), followed by unclassified Bacteria (5.71%), Proteobacteria (3.27%), and Cyanobacteria (1.93%). Among the phyla, 89 OTUs were retrieved, of which 55 genera and one uncultured bacteria were identified, indicating that the vast majority (~ 85%) of the larval symbiont community is composed of Flavobacteriales and unclassified Flavobacteriaceae (79.33%), unclassified Bacteria (5.74%), Spongiiferula (4.04%), and unclassified Bacteroidia (2.41%).

Tubastraea tagusensis larvae share 50 OTUs with the adult colonies, totaling 97.5 and 86.7% of the microbial community from larvae and adults, respectively. Larvae also hosted three out of eight genera that compose the microbial core from the adult colonies, differing by their relative frequency (which was lower in the larvae) and by the absence of Ruegeria (order Rhodobacterales), Enhydrobacter (order Pseudomonadales), Rubrobacter (order Rubrobacterales), Staphylococcus (order Bacillales), and Hydrogenophilus (order Betaproteobacteriales). Therefore, the microbial core is variable according to the developmental stage of the species (i.e. colonies and larvae) (Fig. 2).

Discussion

The microbial community associated with Southwestern Atlantic invasive T. tagusensis is quite diverse. Among the 15 bacterial phyla (264 OTUs), eight compose its microbial core when adults, and three compose the larval microbial core. Such a difference in the composition of the microbial core of larvae and adults has previously been observed in other scleractinians, such as Acropora digitifera [21]. A similar bacterial diversity with an analogous composition has been observed for other shallow-water scleractinians such as Mussismilia braziliensis, M. hispida, Madracis decactis, Tubastraea coccinea, Porites astreoides, and Acropora millepora [38, 45, 46], and also from the zoantharian Palythoa caribaeorum [38]. Furthermore, Blackall et al., [17] also point to a similar frequency and abundance of the same phyla in metagenomic studies of other coral species. One of the most abundant bacterial phylum associated with invasive T. tagusensis (i.e. Proteobacteria), is not only the most abundant in the marine environment [47] but has also been reported associated with Brazilian corals, such as Siderastrea stellata [48] and Mussismilia hispida [38, 49], and Porites astreoides [50], in addition to P. lutea [51], Pocillopora damicornis [52], and Platygyra carnosa [53] from other Atlantic localities or ocean basins.

Microbiome analyses of water samples from Ilha dos Búzios have contained the same main bacterial phyla as that observed in association with T. tagusensis [38]. Such similarity between the seawater microbiota and that associated with corals might indicate: 1) a strategy of obtaining the microbiota, which in this case would be represented by horizontal acquisition (coral microbiome would be obtained from the environment and the association would improve host’s fitness), or 2) an “ancient” relationship coupled with co-evolution of the host and their microbiome. However, additional studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between the water and coral T. tagusensis microbiomes in a lower taxonomical level. Previous studies have shown that the stability of a microbiome community is host-specific and, under different environmental conditions, some hosts maintain the microbial community (e.g. Pocillopora verrucosa) while others seem to adapt (e.g. Acropora hemprichii) [24]. Although the inclusion of samples from other localities/environmental conditions and the native range of T. tagusensis is necessary to test the hypothesis of horizontal transmission, the ability to adapt their microbiome to local environmental conditions would be another tool improving its invasive capabilities.

Within the diversity observed herein, eight OTUs compose on overage 7% of the microbiome in all specimens examined. Therefore, these were considered so far as the microbial core of T. tagusensis. The presence of a microbial core indicates that some genera of bacteria could be crucial to the host [20]. Interestingly, even though Ralstonia (Burkholderiaceae) and Propionibacterium (Propionibacteriaceae) have also been reported as core microbiome members in zooxanthellate coral species [37], a different genus belonging to the same families was identified in T. tagusensis (i.e. Cutibacterium, order Propionibacteriaceae). Representatives from this family have also been considered core microbiome of other species of azooxanthellate scleractinians, such as Dendrophyllia sp., Eguchipsammia fistula [43], and Desmophyllum pertusum [22], as well as in the octocorallians Paramuricea placomus [54], Anthothela grandiflora, Anthothela sp., Lateothela grandiflora, Paramuricea placomus, Primnoa pacifica, and P. resedaeformis [22]. The persistence of a family in the microbial core of these species may be an indication of a long-standing co-evolution between coral lineages and their microbiome.

The host, environment, and time can influence the microbiome composition [26]. However, in general, the host is the most significant factor influencing the microbial community. Despite holding a divergent abundance of a few genera, there were no significant differences in the microbial community over the depth range evaluated for T. tagusensis. The lack of variability might indicate that the sampled bathymetric gradient (i.e. differences in the environmental variable depth here) was not enough to significantly alter the microbiota associated to the corals, or that the microorganism community associated to T. tagusensis is shaped by the host and does not respond to small scale environmental factors, as noted for other species [26]. Although similar results have been documented for Agaricia grahamae sampled from different depths (55 m and 85 m) [25], a bathymetric gradient influenced the composition of the microbiome of Madracis pharensis and Stephanocoenia intersepta [25]. Another factor that might influence our results is the fact that the invasive population of T. tagusensis is highly clonal [55] and, therefore, it is possible that all analyzed specimens were genetically identical. Indeed, when comparing the microbiome of adult colonies to that from larvae, we found that they host a similar microbial community and share part of the microbial core, as proposed in the hologenome theory [27], thus supporting the idea that part of the microbiome is vertically transmitted as shown to occur in Porites astreoides [28] and Acropora digitifera [21].

Therefore, invasive populations of T. tagusensis have two types of microbiome acquisition: the vertical, based on the transmission of the microbial core from the mother colonies to the larvae; and the horizontal transmission supported by the similarity between the microbial profile found in the region’s seawater and part of the colonies’ microbiome. Such mixed acquisition is similar to that observed in Acropora digitifera [21]. Vertical transmission indicates that the relationship between the core microbiome and the host is somewhat guaranteed over generations [21] and that the maintenance of beneficial symbionts [56] influence co-evolution. On the other hand, although horizontal acquisition can also be seen as evolution, it has a much shorter response time as it fluctuates following environmental factors. Thus, if the host acquires the symbionts exclusively through generations, microbiome adaptations following environmental changes would not be observed resulting in potential “unsatisfactory” microbial community that would not improve fitness [56]. In this context, it is possible that the successful invasion of T. tagusensis in the Southwestern Atlantic, in addition to the aforementioned biological factors, includes the mixed transmission capacity of the microbiome, as a factor of rapid adaptation to the adverse conditions of the different environments that it has been settling.

Conclusions

In summary, we present here a description of the symbiont community that lives associated with the invasive coral in Brazil, Tubastraea tagusensis. Genetic analyzes allowed us to identify that a small depth gradient is not an influential factor in altering the composition of the microbiota. We could observe a similarity between the profile of microorganisms found in the seawater and that of the colonies’ microbiome. In addition to identifying a persistent microbial core composed of eight genera for the adult specimens, it is shown that it is partially present in larvae. Therefore, these results indicate that T. tagusensis has vertical and horizontal transmission/acquisition and that this factor can be one of the conditions for its success as an invasive species.

Materials and methods

Sampling, PCR, and sequencing

Thirty-two colonies of T. tagusensis were sampled along a depth gradient (3, 6, and 8 m) in a vertical rocky shore at Ilha dos Búzios, the northern coast of São Paulo on October 9th, 2017 (20 colonies), kept in the freezer until extraction, and November 30th, 2017 (12 colonies), extracted as soon as they arrived at the laboratory. To evaluate the vertical transmission of microbiota, six colonies were kept separately in open-water aquarium systems until the release of larvae, which occurred 19 days after the colonies were placed in aquariums, with the aid of manual pipette. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the outer region of the calyx (containing soft tissue and skeleton) from all 32 samples and from a pool of 10 larvae released from a single colony, using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of DNA were verified by electrophoresis in agarose gel (1.5%) and spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000), respectively. 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the universal primers 27F and 519R [57, 58]. Reaction contained 16 ng of DNA, 2.5 μl of 10X Advantage-2 PCR Buffer, 2.5 mM of dNTP Mix, 5 μM of each primer, 0.5 μl of Advantage-HF 2 polymerase, and ultrapure water up to a final volume of 25 μl. Reactions were performed according to the following cycling condition: initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 60s, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30s, 56 °C for 40s and 68 °C for 33 s, with a final extension at 68 °C for 33 s.

PCR products were purified using magnetic beads (Agencourt AMPure XP) following the manufacturer’s instructions and eluted on 50 μl of TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The concentration of purified amplicons was determined using Qubit® dsDNA BR Assay Kit. Libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA Library Prep Kit and kept frozen until sequencing. Upon sequencing each library was quantified using Qubit® dsDNA HS Assay Kit and size verified using capillary electrophoresis (Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip). Sequencing was performed using the MiSeq Nano kit v2 (500 cycles) at the Facility Center for Research from the University of São Paulo (CEFAP-USP). Sequences were deposited in the SRA database (PRJNA637639).

Bioinformatics

Low-quality and short sequences (< 50pb) were removed using the SolexaQA++ [59]. Identical sequences were grouped using the Swarm software with d = 1 [60] and then classified using the classify.seqs command on the Mothur platform, with a bootstrap cutoff of 80 [61] using the database 16S Silva-v1.32 (DBS) [62]. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles software (STAMP - Parks et al. [63]) after removing eukaryote, chloroplast, mitochondria, and unknown sequences. Statistical analyses were performed through variance analyses (ANOVA) and post-hoc Turkey-Kramer tests, with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction of multiple tests, and p-value < 0.01 to identify the relative frequency of OTUs by the depth and significant differences between groups (3, 6, and 8 m). Whites’ two-sided nonparametric t-test, confidence interval method (DP bootstrap, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR multiple test correction and p-value filter of 0.01) were applied for comparisons between the groups of the adult colonies and larvae, and also between depths (i.e., 3 - 6 m, 3 - 8 m, and 6 - 8 m). Diversity parameters were calculated from the classification tables (phylum, class, order, family, and gender) such as richness estimators Shannon, Neff Shannon, Simpson, and Neff Simpson (inverse Simpson index).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. 1.

    de Paula AF, Creed JC. Two species of the coral Tubastraea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) in Brazil: a case of accidental introduction. Bull Mar Sci. 2004;74:175–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lages BG, Fleury BG, Menegola C, Creed JC. Change in tropical rocky shore communities due to an alien coral invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011;438:85–96. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Miranda R, Tagliafico A, Kelaher B, Mariano-Neto E, Barros F. Impact of invasive corals Tubastrea spp. on native coral recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;605:125–33. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Silva R, Vinagre C, Kitahara MV, Acorsi IV, Mizrahi D, Flores AAV. Sun coral invasion of shallow rocky reefs: effects on mobile invertebrate assemblages in southeastern Brazil. Biol Invasions. 2019;21:1339–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1903-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Castro CB, Pires DO. Brazilian coral reefs: what we already know and what is still missing. Bull Mar Sci. 2001;69:357–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Soares MO, Davis M, Carneiro PBM. Northward range expansion of the invasive coral (Tubastraea tagusensis) in the southwestern Atlantic. Mar Biodivers. 2018;48:1651–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-016-0623-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ferreira CEL, Gonçalves JEA, Coutinho R. Cascos de navios e plataformas como vetores na introdução de espécies exóticas. Água Lastro E Bioinvasão; 2004. p. 143–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Creed JC, Eduardo A, Oliveira S, de Paula AF. Cnidaria, Scleractinia, Tubastraea coccinea lesson, 1829 and Tubastraea tagusensis Wells, 1982: distribution extension. Check List. 2008;4:297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sampaio CLS, Miranda RJ, Maia-Nogueira R, de Nunes JCCA. New occurrences of the nonindigenous orange cup corals Tubastraea coccinea and T. tagusensis (Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae) in southwestern Atlantic. Check List. 2012;8:528–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Costa TJF, Pinheiro HT, Teixeira JB, Mazzei EF, Bueno L, Hora MSC, et al. Expansion of an invasive coral species over Abrolhos Bank, Souhwestern Atlantic. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;85:252–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Silva AG, de Paula AF, Fleury BG, Creed JC. Eleven years of range expansion of two invasive corals (Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis) through the Southwest Atlantic (Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2014;141:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mantelatto MC, Creed JC, Mourão GG, Migotto AE, Lindner A. Range expansion of the invasive corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis in the Southwest Atlantic. Coral Reefs. 2011;30:397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0720-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Creed JC. Two invasive alien azooxanthellate corals, Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis, dominate the native zooxanthellate Mussismilia hispida in Brazil. Coral Reefs. 2006;25:350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0105-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Capel KC, Creed JC, Kitahara MV. Invasive corals trigger seascape changes in the southwestern Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci. 2019;96:217–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cairns SD. A revision of the Ahermatypic Scleractinia of the Galapagos and Cocos Islands. Smithson Contrib Zool. 1991:1–32. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.504.

  16. 16.

    de Paula AF, Pires DO, Creed JC. Reproductive strategies of two invasive sun corals (Tubastraea spp.) in the Southwestern Atlantic. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2014;94:481–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315413001446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Blackall LL, Wilson B, Van Oppen MJHH. Coral - the world’s most diverse symbiotic ecosystem. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:5330–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fraune S, Bosch TCG. Why bacteria matter in animal development and evolution. BioEssays. 2010;32:571–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900192.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome. 2018;6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0457-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hernandez-Agreda A, Gates RD, Ainsworth TD. Defining the core microbiome in corals’ microbial soup. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:125–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bernasconi R, Stat M, Koenders A, Paparini A, Bunce M, Huggett MJ. Establishment of coral-bacteria symbioses reveal changes in the core bacterial community with host ontogeny. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kellogg CA. Microbiomes of stony and soft deep-sea corals share rare core bacteria. Microbiome. 2019;7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0697-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Glasl B, Smith CE, Bourne DG, Webster NS. Disentangling the effect of host-genotype and environment on the microbiome of the coral Acropora tenuis. PeerJ. 2019;7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6377.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ziegler M, Grupstra CGB, Barreto MM, Eaton M, BaOmar J, Zubier K, et al. Coral bacterial community structure responds to environmental change in a host-specific manner. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10969-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Glasl B, Bongaerts P, Elisabeth NH, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Herndl GJ, Frade PR. Microbiome variation in corals with distinct depth distribution ranges across a shallow–mesophotic gradient (15–85 m). Coral Reefs. 2017;36:447–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-016-1517-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dunphy CM, Gouhier TC, Chu ND, Vollmer SV. Structure and stability of the coral microbiome in space and time. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43268-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease, and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:355–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1635.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sharp KH, Distel D, Paul VJ. Diversity and dynamics of bacterial communities in early life stages of the Caribbean coral Porites astreoides. ISME J. 2012;6:790–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.144.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thurber RV, Willner-Hall D, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Desnues C, Edwards RA, Angly F, et al. Metagenomic analysis of stressed coral holobionts. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:2148–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01935.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McFall-Ngai MJ. Unseen forces: the influence of bacteria on animal development. Dev Biol. 2002;242:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0522.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Saffo M. Symbiosis: the way of all life. In: Seckbach J, editor. Life as we know it. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 325–39.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gilbert SF, McDonald E, Boyle N, Buttino N, Gyi L, Mai M, et al. Symbiosis as a source of selectable epigenetic variation: taking the heat for the big guy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:671–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rohwer F, Edwards R. The phage proteomic tree: a genome-based taxonomy for phage. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:4529–35. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.16.4529.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gilbert SF, Sapp J, Tauber AI. A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol. 2012;87:325–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/668166.

  35. 35.

    Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:723–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. Symbiosis and development: the hologenome concept. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2011;93:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20196.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ainsworth TD, Krause L, Bridge T, Torda G, Raina J-B, Zakrzewski M, et al. The coral core microbiome identifies rare bacterial taxa as ubiquitous endosymbionts. ISME J. 2015;9:2261–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Carlos C, Torres TT, Ottoboni LMM. Bacterial communities and species-specific associations with the mucus of Brazilian coral species. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01624.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Apprill A, Marlow HQ, Martindale MQ, Rappé MS. Specificity of associations between bacteria and the coral Pocillopora meandrina during early development. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7467–75. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01232-12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Meistertzheim A-L, Lartaud F, Arnaud-Haond S, Kalenitchenko D, Bessalam M, Le Bris N, et al. Patterns of bacteria-host associations suggest different ecological strategies between two reef-building cold-water coral species. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2016;114:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Neulinger SC, Järnegren J, Ludvigsen M, Lochte K, Dullo WC. Phenotype-specific bacterial communities in the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia) and their implications for the coral’s nutrition, health, and distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:7272–85. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01777-08.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yang S, Sun W, Tang C, Jin L, Zhang F, Li Z. Phylogenetic diversity of actinobacteria associated with soft coral Alcyonium gracllimum and stony coral Tubastraea coccinea in the East China Sea. Microb Ecol. 2013;66:189–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0205-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Röthig T, Yum LK, Kremb SG, Roik A, Voolstra CR. Microbial community composition of deep-sea corals from the Red Sea provides insight into functional adaption to a unique environment. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44714.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-385.

  45. 45.

    Littman R, Willis BL, Bourne DG. Metagenomic analysis of the coral holobiont during a natural bleaching event on the great barrier reef. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011;3:651–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00234.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Garcia GD, Gregoracci GB, Santos ED, Meirelles PM, Silva GG, Edwards R, et al. Metagenomic analysis of healthy and white plague-affected Mussismilia braziliensis corals. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:1076–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0161-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Amaral-Zettler L, Artigas LF, Baross J, Bharathi L, Boetius A, Chandramohan D, et al. A global census of marine microbes. In: McIntyre AD, editor. Life in the World’s Oceans: Diversity, Distribution, and Abundance. Scotland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010. p. 221–45.

  48. 48.

    Lins-de-Barros MM, Cardoso AM, Silveira CB, Lima JL, Clementino MM, Martins OB, et al. Microbial community compositional shifts in bleached colonies of the brazilian reef-building coral Siderastrea stellata. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:205–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0095-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lins-de-Barros MM, Vieira RP, Cardoso AM, Monteiro VA, Turque AS, Silveira CB, et al. Archaea, bacteria, and algal plastids associated with the reef-building corals Siderastrea stellata and Mussismilia hispida from Búzios, South Atlantic Ocean, Brazil. Microb Ecol. 2010;59:523–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9612-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wegley L, Edwards R, Rodriguez-Brito B, Liu H, Rohwer F. Metagenomic analysis of the microbial community associated with the coral Porites astreoides. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2707–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01383.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Séré MG, Tortosa P, Chabanet P, Turquet J, Quod J-P, Schleyer MH. Bacterial communities associated with porites white patch syndrome (pwps) on three Western Indian Ocean (WIO) coral reefs. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083746.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yokouchi H, Fukuoka Y, Mukoyama D, Calugay R, Takeyama H, Matsunaga T. Whole-metagenome amplification of a microbial community associated with scleractinian coral by multiple displacement amplification using φ29 polymerase. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1155–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01005.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ng JCY, Chan Y, Tun HM, Leung FCC, Shin PKS, Chiu JMY. Pyrosequencing of the bacteria associated with Platygyra carnosus corals with skeletal growth anomalies reveals differences in bacterial community composition in apparently healthy and diseased tissues. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01142.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kellogg CA, Ross SW, Brooke SD. Bacterial community diversity of the deep-sea octocoral Paramuricea placomus. PeerJ. 2016;4:2–25. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Capel KCC, Toonen RJ, Rachid CTCC, Creed JC, Kitahara MV, Forsman Z, et al. Clone wars: asexual reproduction dominates in the invasive range of Tubastraea spp. (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) in the South-Atlantic Ocean. PeerJ. 2017;5:1–21. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Byler KA, Carmi-Veal M, Fine M, Goulet TL. Multiple symbiont acquisition strategies as an adaptive mechanism in the coral Stylophora pistillata. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059596.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic Acid Tech Bact Syst. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991. p. 115–75.

  58. 58.

    Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VPW, Palmer JD. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999;46:327–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04612.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ. SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:485. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mahé F, Rognes T, Quince C, de Vargas C, Dunthorn M. Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. PeerJ. 2014;2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–41. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3123–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are also thankful to CEBIMar staff for all their support and the technicians of the GENIAL/CEFAP/USP sequencing facility for all discussions during the development of the present research. MVK thanks the support of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Process #2014/01332-0) and National Research Council (CNPq, Process #301436/2018-5).

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Finance Code 001 (MSc scholarship to AAZ), and by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Process #2014/01332–0) and National Research Council (CNPq, Process #301436/2018–5).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The work presented here was carried out in collaboration among all authors. AAZ in cooperation with MVK defined the research theme and designed the experiment. AAZ obtained sequences, and in collaboration with GBG performed the analyses. All authors discussed results, interpretation, presentation, helped to draft the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aline Aparecida Zanotti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Specimens used in the present study were sampled under the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources authorization (SISBIO 41562/2 and 36717/17).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table with identification taxonomic of the microbiome associated with colonies, including genus, family, order, class, phylum, domain and sequences for each sample.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Microbiome associated with the invasive colonies of Tubastraea tagusensis. Interactive Figure [44].

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanotti, A.A., Gregoracci, G.B., Capel, K.C.C. et al. Microbiome of the Southwestern Atlantic invasive scleractinian coral, Tubastraea tagusensis. anim microbiome 2, 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00047-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Coral
  • Bacteria
  • Core microbiome
  • Amplicon metagenomics