Skip to main content
Download PDF

Succession in the caecal microbiota of developing broilers colonised by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

Animal Microbiome volume 4, Article number: 51 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Broilers are among the most common and dense poultry production systems, where antimicrobials have been used extensively to promote animal health and performance. The continuous usage of antimicrobials has contributed to the appearance of resistant bacteria, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec). Here, we studied the ESBL-Ec prevalence and successional dynamics of the caecal microbiota of developing broilers in a commercial flock during their production life cycle (0–35 days). Broilers were categorised as ESBL-Ec colonised (ESBL-Ec+) or ESBL-Ec non-colonised (ESBL-Ec−) by selective culturing. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we i. compared the richness, evenness and composition of the caecal microbiota of both broilers’ groups and ii. assessed the combined role of age and ESBL-Ec status on the broilers’ caecal microbiota.

Results

From day two, we observed an increasing linear trend in the proportions of ESBL-Ec throughout the broilers' production life cycle, X2 (1, N = 12) = 28.4, p < 0.001. Over time, the caecal microbiota richness was consistently higher in ESBL-Ec− broilers, but significant differences between both broilers’ groups were found exclusively on day three (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.016). Bray–Curtis distance-based RDA (BC-dbRDA) showed no explanatory power of ESBL-Ec status, while age explained 14% of the compositional variation of the caecal microbiota, F (2, 66) = 6.47, p = 0.001.

Conclusions

This study assessed the role of ESBL-Ec in the successional dynamics of the caecal microbiota in developing broilers and showed that the presence of ESBL-Ec is associated with mild but consistent reductions in alpha diversity and with transient bacterial compositional differences. We also reported the clonal spread of ESBL-Ec and pointed to the farm environment as a likely source for ESBLs.

Background

Poultry are considered one of the most important animal protein sources and are a major driver of the global growth in protein production [1] but at the same time, the poultry industry has been identified as an important source of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [2]. Broiler chicken farms are among the most common and dense poultry production systems, where antimicrobials have been used extensively to promote animal health and performance. The broad and continuous therapeutic and prophylactic usage of antimicrobials has contributed to the global emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) among pathogenic and commensal Enterobacterales, especially Escherichia coli [3, 4].

ESBL-producing Enterobacterales have been recognised as a public health threat due to their capacity to inactivate a large group of critically important antibiotics belonging to the group of β-lactams, like the extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC) [5, 6]. Despite the crucial action plans carried out by several European countries against AMR, e.g. the ban of growth promoters in The Netherlands since 2006 and the changes in policies for antimicrobial usage in animals [7, 8], the spread of commensal ESBL-producing Enterobacterales is still observed across animal production systems. This spread has been associated with the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of ESBL families like TEM, CTX-M and SHV through conjugative plasmids capable of persisting successfully in the host and the environment [9].

Alternatives to reduce ESBL HGT in poultry productions include modulating nutrient-rich and densely populated microbial ecosystems like the broilers’ caeca [10]. The caeca are finger-like shaped organs that harbors the highest number of microorganisms in the broiler’s gastrointestinal tract, which facilitates the exchange of ESBL plasmids among commensal and pathogenic bacteria [11]. The development of the caecal microbiota of commercial broilers has been associated primarily with environmental sources [12, 13]. Immediately after hatching, chickens are colonised by exogenous microorganisms that can potentially act as a reservoir of ESBL genes in the caecal microbiota, including E. coli [14, 15]. As the broiler ages, the caecal microbiota undergoes successional changes, which involve rapid and directional turnover towards a more diverse community with a lower abundance of Enterobacterales, including E. coli [16, 17]. How the timing of colonisation of ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec) is affected by these microbial successional dynamics, and whether the presence of ESBL-Ec affects the development of the caecal microbiota of broilers is unknown.

Here, we studied the ESBL-Ec prevalence and successional dynamics of the caecal microbiota of developing broilers in a commercial flock during their production life cycle. Broilers were categorised as ESBL-Ec colonised (ESBL-Ec+) or ESBL-Ec non-colonised (ESBL-Ec−) by selective culturing. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we compared the richness, evenness and composition of the caecal microbiota of both broilers’ groups and assessed the combined role of age and ESBL-Ec status on the microbiota. We observed a linear increasing trend in the proportions of ESBL-Ec throughout the broilers' production round. Over time, microbial richness was consistently higher in ESBL-Ec− broilers, but significant differences between groups were found exclusively on day three. Bray–Curtis distance-based RDA (BC-dbRDA) showed no explanatory power of ESBL-Ec status, while age explained 14% of the compositional variation of the caecal microbiota.

Results

Prevalence and typing of ESBL producing E. coli

Caecal samples were collected on a Dutch commercial broiler farm throughout the production round (days 0–7, 14, 21, 28 and 35). Culture-based methods were applied to each caecal sample to discriminate between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers. ESBL-Ec were detected from day 2 with a sample prevalence of 11% CI [1; 34] and rapidly increased to 72% CI [46; 90] until day 5. Prevalence fluctuated between days 6 and 28 but remained above 50%. All caecal samples were positive for ESBL-Ec on day 35 (Fig. 1). An increasing linear trend in the proportions of ESBL-Ec was observed throughout the broilers' production round, X2 (1, N = 12) = 28.4, p < 0.001.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ESBL-E.coli prevalence throughout the broilers’ life cycle. Trends of ESBL-Ec prevalence in the total broiler population

Full size image

The most prevalent ESBL/AmpC-gene families responsible for the ESC-resistant phenotype in The Netherlands (CTX-M, SHV, TEM and CMY) were determined using real-time PCR. Both blaSHV and blaTEM PCR products were amplified for all 109 ESC-resistant E. coli isolates. Sanger sequencing of 18 of these products spread over the production round indicated that all strains carried the ESBL gene blaSHV-12 and the non-ESBL beta-lactamase blaTEM-1b (see Additional file 1). Bacterial transformation and subsequent PCR-based replicon typing (PBRT) demonstrated that blaSHV-12 genes were located on IncI1α plasmids in all 18 isolates. From these, 10 isolates spread over the production round were chosen for in-depth analysis. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (EUVSEC3) showed identical antimicrobial resistance profiles in all 10 isolates (see Additional file 2). PCR and Sanger sequencing showed that all 10 isolates belonged to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) type 1011, while all IncI1α plasmids belonged to pMLST type 3.

Characterisation of the caecal bacterial composition of ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers

Due to the rapid increase of ESBL-Ec prevalence over time, microbiota comparisons between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers were only possible between days 3 and 28. Except for two phyla, no significant differences in the relative abundances of phyla were found between broilers' groups. Bacteroidetes were significantly higher in ESBL-Ec+ broilers on day 21 (ANCOM-BC, p = 0.003), while Tenericutes were significantly higher in ESBL-Ec− broilers on day 28 (ANCOM-BC, p < 0.001). Both phyla represented only a small part of the total community (< 5%).

Of the six bacterial phyla identified, Firmicutes were the most abundant with an average relative abundance of 77.9% ± 20.3, followed by Proteobacteria (18.2% ± 22.0) and Bacteroidetes (3.1% ± 6.3). Across all samples, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes and Cyanobacteria combined represented only 0.8% ± 0.2 of the total taxa. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria predominated in the developing caecal microbiota of ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers until day 14 (Fig. 2a,b). While the relative abundances of these phyla fluctuated during this period, no significant differences over time were found (ANCOM-BC, p > 0.05). Bacteroidetes were detected from day 14 onwards with a continuous increase in numbers until the end of the broiler's production life (16.6% ± 5.1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Caecal microbiota composition of ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. a–b Relative abundance of bacterial phyla of ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers from day 3–28. c–d Relative abundance of the top ten genera of ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. The relative abundance of each phylum and genus is shown in decreasing order from bottom to top

Full size image

Shifts in relative abundances of families were observed over time (see Additional file 3). However, no differential abundance was found between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers (ANCOM-BC, p > 0.05). Within the phylum Firmicutes, families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were the most prevalent over time in both broilers’ groups. Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were represented by the families Enterobacteriaceae (99%) and Rikenellaceae (100%), respectively. The main representative families of Actinobacteria were Eggerthellaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae, while for Tenericutes, it was Anaeroplasmataceae.

The ten most abundant genera in both broiler groups made up 45.7% ± 1.4 and 52.9% ± 2.7 of the total microbial community of ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers, respectively. Only on day 3, the bacterial community of ESBL-Ec+ broilers was dominated by five genera; Klebsiella, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Blautia and Escherichia/Shigella (87% of the whole community), while in ESBL-Ec− broilers, the bacterial composition was much more diverse (Fig. 2c, d). The relative abundances of Eisenbergiella and Subdoligranulum were significantly higher in ESBL-Ec− broilers on days 3 and 4, respectively (ANCOM-BC, p < 0.001). Alistipes was the most abundant taxon in ESBL-Ec+ broilers on days 21 (13.1% ± 5.5) and 28 (14.5% ± 5.4). Significant differences were found only on day 21 where in ESBL-Ec− broilers Alistipes made up only 3.8% ± 2.2 of the community (ANCOM-BC, p = 0.01).

Relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella

Fifteen amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with Escherichia/Shigella were recovered (Fig. 3a), but only two persisted over time. Across all samples, Escherichia/Shigella was dominant both in ESBL-Ec+ (6.5% ± 7.1) and ESBL-Ec− broilers (17.7% ± 19.3), but they decreased over time, from 37.3% ± 24.0 on day 1, to 1.3% ± 2.2 on day 35. Importantly, on day 1, all chickens were ESBL ESBL-Ec−. The relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella decreased as broilers aged. No differential abundance of Escherichia/Shigella between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers were observed over time (ANCOM-BC, p > 0.05; Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella genus. a Relative abundance trends of fifteen amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) recovered from the broilers’ caeca and associated with the Escherichia/Shigella genus. Each dot represents the relative abundance mean of each ASV per time point. b Escherichia/Shigella relative abundance over time in ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. No differential abundance of Escherichia/Shigella was observed over time between broilers' groups (ANCOM-BC, p > 0.05)

Full size image

Alpha diversity (microbial richness and evenness)

To study the richness and evenness of the caecal microbiota, we measured the number of observed ASVs and Pielou's evenness, respectively. Microbial richness increased with the broilers' age, from 103.3 ± 115.2 ASVs on day zero to 649.6 ± 202.9 on day 35 (Fig. 4a). Broiler’s age significantly predicted microbial richness over time with the formula: observed richness = 101.24 + 20.87 x (time), Adj R2 = 0.76, p < 0.001. Over time, the observed richness was consistently higher in ESBL-Ec− broilers (Fig. 4b), but significant differences between both groups were found exclusively on day three, when ESBL-Ec− showed a higher number of ASVs than ESBL-Ec+ broilers (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.016).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Caecal microbiota richness and evenness of ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. a Observed microbiota richness in all broilers during their production life cycle. Small dots represent the amplicon sequences variants (ASVs) observed in each individual broiler and enlarged dots represent the ASVs mean from all broilers samples in each time point. The grey area represents the 95% confidence interval. Age significantly predicted microbial richness over time (p < 0.001). b Comparison of microbiota richness between ESBL-Ec− and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. The asterisk denotes a p < 0.05 for the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. c Comparison of microbiota evenness between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers

Full size image

Community evenness rapidly increased in young broilers (day 0–5) and plateaued after five days in both groups (Fig. 4c). No significant differences were found between ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p > 0.05).

Beta diversity

Changes in the caecal microbiota composition were analysed with Bray–Curtis principal coordinate (BC-PCoA) and Bray–Curtis distance-based RDA (BC-dbRDA) analyses. Samples clustered significantly according to age (Adonis, p < 0.001; Fig. 5). Pairwise analysis showed significant differences between all days pairing (Pairwise Adonis, p < 0.05), except for days 0–1 and days 28–35. No significant clustering by ESBL-status was observed in samples from days 3–28. No collinearity was found between age and ESBL (VIF < 3). BC-dbRDA showed no explanatory power of ESBL status, while age explained 14% of the compositional variation of the caecal microbiota, F (2, 66) = 6.47, p = 0.001.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray Curtis dissimilarity metrics (BC-PCoA). Changes in the caecal microbial community composition over time (day 0–35). Age explained 14% of the compositional variation of the caecal microbiome (BC-dbRDA: F (2,66) = 6.47, p = 0.001). ESBL-status explained no variability

Full size image

Discussion

Exploring the successional dynamics of the caecal microbiota of broilers can reveal windows of opportunity to implement intervention strategies that reduce the spread of resistant commensal and pathogenic bacteria. However, little is known about how changes in the developing caecal microbiota affect the prevalence of ESBL-Ec or how the presence of ESBL-Ec affects the microbiota. Here, we studied the caecal microbiota of developing commercial broilers in conventional farming conditions and classified them as ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec−. We found no clear divergence between these two groups over time, suggesting that the presence of ESBL-Ec does not have consistent effects on the caecal microbiota of developing broilers.

All broilers tested negative for ESBL-Ec on days zero and one. ESBL-Ec was detected only from day two onwards, and its prevalence increased rapidly over time, suggesting that the farm environment was the likely source for ESBL-Ec colonisation. The AMR phenotype, ESBL-gene, plasmid typing and MLST results were identical for all samples, indicating a clonal spread of ESBL-Ec throughout the flock. The clonal distribution of ESBL-Ec has been associated with the high shedding of ESBL-Ec after colonisation in previous studies [14].

In contrast to the ESBL-Ec prevalence trends, the relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella decreased over time in both groups of broilers. This reflects the broilers' microbiota dynamic development over time; as broilers age, the microbial diversity increases, causing shifts in bacterial abundances. Despite the continuous dominance of members of the phylum Firmicutes, Escherichia/Shigella persisted throughout the broilers production life cycle. The observed changes in the caecal microbiota composition over time resembled those documented in previous studies: the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased as broilers aged, while the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes gradually increased [16, 18, 19].

A possible explanation for the high prevalence of ESBL-Ec in broilers at day 35, when the relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella was not higher than 5%, is that other microbiota community members might acquire, carry and contribute to the spread of ESBL genes. A previous in vitro study reported the successful transfer of CMY-2-encoding IncI1 plasmids from exogenous E. coli to members of the human gut microbiota [20]. IncI1 plasmids have been described as promiscuous plasmids that can migrate within the members of the order Enterobacterales and likely between different bacterial species [21, 22]. To better understand the prevalence of ESBL-Ec in the broilers' caecal microbiota, we intend to quantify E. coli (16S rRNA gene copy numbers) by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in future studies.

Consistent with the literature [16, 18, 19], the observed caecal microbial richness increased linearly as broilers aged in both groups. Overall, microbial richness was not significantly different between groups. However, a higher microbial richness was consistently observed in ESBL-Ec− compared to ESBL-Ec+ broilers over time. In line with this finding, ESBL-colonised broilers showed a much less diverse microbial composition on day three, with only five genera representing 86% of the total community. These results suggest small but consistent alterations in the microbiota's competitive landscape, which could be further explored with controlled, culture-based laboratory experiments.

As shown in previous research [16, 19, 23, 24], host ageing is one of the drivers of microbiota composition. In our study, age explained 14% of the microbial composition variability. The succession of the broilers' microbial communities was observed in three stages. The first stage (days 0–4) was dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, mainly by families Clostridiaceae, Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae. A decrease in Proteobacteria (< 10%) and a complete dominance (> 80%) by members of the Firmicutes (families Ruminococcaceae, Lachinospiraceae and Lactobacillaceae) characterised the second stage (days 5–14). In the third stage (days 21–35), Proteobacteria continued steadily decreasing (< 5%), while Bacteroidetes emerged, accounting for 16.6% of the total community. Firmicutes were still extensively represented principally by families Ruminococcaceae and Lachinospiraceae and the appearance of members of the Clostridiales. Despite the differences in study designs, these observations support previous results [16, 19], in which successional dynamics were also characterised in 3 stages and represented by similar phyla and families. On the other hand, the colonisation by ESBL-Ec did not explain any variability in the caecal microbiota composition in this study. Our results match previous observations [25], in which asymptomatic gut carriage of ESBL-Ec was not associated with differences in microbiota composition in humans.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the differences in the microbiota composition and diversity of ESBL-Ec+ and ESBL-Ec− broilers from a commercial farm throughout the production round. A previous experimental study examined the microbiota of broilers colonised with ESBL-Ec and treated with competitive exclusion products on days 5 and 21 [26]. However, the study aimed to evaluate the effect of compartmentalisation and interventions on the transmission and prevention of ESBL-Ec colonisation in the broiler microbiota composition more than the effect of ESBL-Ec on the broilers caecal microbiota. Longitudinal-experimental studies which manipulate ESBL-Ec prevalence could reveal the process of colonisation of ESBL-Ec in the caecal microbiota and shed light on the relationship between AMR bacteria, the caecal microbiota, and potential avenues for microbiota-based control of AMR. Our study highlights the need to consider the natural dynamics of the host-microbiota development and colonisation by resistant bacteria.

Conclusions

This study contributes to assessing the role of ESBL-Ec in the successional dynamics of the caecal microbiota in developing broilers and shows that the presence of ESBL-Ec is associated with mild but consistent reductions in alpha diversity and transient microbiota compositional differences. Our study further documents the clonal spread of ESBL-Ec and points at the farm environment as a likely source for ESBLs. We also report the ESBL-Ec prevalence trend in a single broilers’ flock and during a single production round. Future research should aim to determine if the observed patterns of ESBL-Ec spread are common across production cycles and farms and seek to more precisely understand whether the presence of ESBL-Ec modulates the competitive landscape of the broiler microbiota or vice-versa.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) originated from a single flock in a Dutch commercial broiler farm. Fertilised eggs were hatched on the broiler farm. In total, 216 birds were randomly sampled at 12 different time points of the production cycle (days 0–7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 of age), beginning on the day of hatching. Eighteen chickens were euthanised for caecal sample collection at each time point. Samples were collected between October and December 2017. Caecal content was aseptically collected from individual birds. A portion was used for cultivation within 4 h, while the rest of the sample was preserved for further analyses.

Selective isolation of ESBL-E. coli

Selective culture media was used for screening the caecal samples for the presence of ESBL-producing E. coli. Samples (n = 216) were aseptically collected from individual caeca by using sterile swabs. The collected swabs were placed on 3 mL of peptone water for bacterial enrichment and incubated overnight at 37 °C. A day after, 10 µL of the enrichment were inoculated on a MacConkey agar plate containing 1 mg/L cefotaxime. After overnight incubation at 44 °C, a suspected E. coli colony was randomly selected, sub-cultured on Heart Infusion Sheep blood (5%) agar (HIS) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Colonies were confirmed as E. coli by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Maldi Biotyper Compass, Bruker®).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial phenotypes were determined by broth microdilution according to ISO 20776–1 using a commercially available antibiotic panel (plate format EUVSEC3, (Thermo Scientific) intended for antimicrobial monitoring of E. coli and Salmonella according to the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1729 based on EFSA guidelines) [27]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results were interpreted with published epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [28].

Plasmid identification

Putative ESBL-E. coli isolates were selected for gene and plasmid identification using real-time PCR [29] and PCR Based Replicon Typing [30]. Isolates were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and incubated overnight at 37 °C (shaking). Plasmid DNA was extracted as previously described [31] and used for bacterial transformation. For this, plasmid DNA (1 μL) was mixed with 12 μL of electrocompetent cells (ElectroMax™ DH10B cells, Gibco Invitrogen). The mix was added to a 0.1 cm gap length cuvette and kept on ice. Electroporation was performed using 200 Ω – 1.25 kV—25 μF. Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 45 min on LB broth and then streaked on LB agar plates containing 1 mg/L cefotaxime. After overnight incubation (37 °C), one putative transformant colony was selected per plate and restreaked on selective LB agar. DNA of putative transformants was extracted for i. resistance gene confirmation and ii. plasmid identification by PCR Based Replicon Typing (PBRT 2.0 Diatheva) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Nucleic acid extraction

DNA was extracted from 0.2 g of caecal content using the Qiagen kit QIAamp Fast DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In addition to the manufacturer's protocol, a bead-beating step was included at the beginning of the extraction; samples were treated in a FastPrep-24 5G® at 30 Hz for 30 s in each of the three cycles. DNA was eluted in 35 uL of nuclease-free water. The ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard (Zymo Research) was used as positive control for the DNA extraction and downstream processing steps.

Amplification and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Extracted DNA was quantified using a CLARIOstar® (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified in all the samples in triplicate to minimise PCR biases. The PCR reaction consisted of 25 μL total volume, including 12.5 μL of Q5 master mix, 1 μL of V3V4 primer mix (CVI_V3-forw 5' CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG 3' and CVI_V4-rev 5' GGACTACHVGGGTWTCT 3'), 2.5 μL DNA and 9 μL of nuclease-free water. Amplification conditions consisted of 98 °C for 2 min, 20 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 10 s, and finally 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were pooled, analysed on a 48 well 2% E-gel (ThermoFisher Scientific) and then sequenced on a Miseq (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using a 2 × 300 bp paired-end cycle sequencing run.

Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) identification and taxonomy assignment

Analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequence reads were conducted in R 3.6.3 [32] with the dada2 v1.14.0 package [33]. Low-quality reads were filtered and trimmed using the parameters truncLenFR = 240,240 and trimLeft = 17, respectively. After merging the forward and reverse reads and removing chimaeras, ASVs were assigned with the SILVA v.132 classifier [34].

Downstream and statistical analysis

After quality control, 2,582,888 16S rRNA gene sequences were recovered from 89 caecal samples and rarefied to 29,351 reads per sample (rngseed = 1). One sample (day 0) with a low number of reads (< 30) was excluded from the analyses. Alpha diversity (observed richness and evenness) was estimated at the ASV level in all samples using the phyloseq v.1.30.0 and microbiome v.2.1.26 packages, respectively. Differences in alpha diversity between broiler groups were evaluated by using Wilcoxon rank-sum test with the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction.

Broiler caecal microbiota relative abundance was estimated at phylum, family and genus level with the phyloseq v.1.30.0 package. Relative abundances are presented as mean and standard deviations. Differential abundance testing between broilers groups was performed for each time point using the ANCOMBC v.1.0.5 package with the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction [35].

Beta diversity (constrain and unconstrained) analyses were performed using the Bray–Curtis distances at the ASV level. Changes in the broiler's caecal microbial community composition were visualised with principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and tested with permutational multivariate analysis of variance (Adonis). Distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) and variation partitioning were performed to assess the effect of age and ESBL-status on the broiler's microbial caecal composition using the functions dbrda and varPart from the vegan (v.2.5-7) package. dbRDA models were tested for multicollinearity using the variance inflation factors (VIF) with the function vic.cca from the vegan (v.2.5-7) package [36].

ESBL-Ec prevalence

Prevalences with their associated 95% confidence intervals based on the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were estimated for each time point. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson binomial method [37] from the prevalence (v.0.4.0) package [38]. Prevalence was calculated, and trends in ESBL-Ec prevalence were tested with a chi-squared test for trends in proportions using the function prop.trend.test from the stats (v.3.6.2) package.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed in the current study are available in the Figshare repository https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_and_analyses_used_in_the_research_paper_Succession_in_the_caecal_microbiota_of_developing_broilers_colonised_by_Extended-spectrum_-lactamase-producing_Escherichia_coli_/16611091.

Abbreviations

AMR:

Antimicrobial resistance

ANCOM-BC:

Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction

ASV:

Amplicon sequence variant

BC-dbRDA:

Bray Curtis distance-based RDA

BC-PCoA:

Bray–Curtis principal coordinate

ECOFF:

Epidemiological cut-off values

ESBL-Ec:

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

ESBL-Ec+ :

ESBL-Ec colonised broilers

ESBL-Ec− :

ESBL-Ec non-colonised broilers

ESC:

Extended-spectrum cephalosporins

EUCAST:

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

HGT:

Horizontal gene transfer

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

MLST:

Multilocus sequence typing

pMLST:

Plasmid multilocus sequence typing

PBRT:

Bacterial transformation and subsequent PCR-based replicon typing

References

  1. OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2017–2026 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2017-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:5649–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peirano G, Pitout JDD. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae: update on molecular epidemiology and treatment options. Drugs. 2019;79:1529–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gniadkowski M. Evolution and epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and ESBL-producing microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7:597–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebana E, Carattoli A, Coque TM, Hasman H, Magiorakos A-P, Mevius D, et al. Public health risks of enterobacterial isolates producing extended-spectrum -lactamases or AmpC -lactamases in food and food-producing animals: an EU perspective of epidemiology, analytical methods, risk factors, and control options. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1030–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:933–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Speksnijder DC, Mevius DJ, Bruschke CJM, Wagenaar JA. Reduction of veterinary antimicrobial use in the Netherlands. The Dutch success model. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European comission. Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect [Internet]. 2005. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_05_1687

  9. Carattoli A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:298–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sood U, Gupta V, Kumar R, Lal S, Fawcett D, Rattan S, et al. Chicken gut microbiome and human health: past scenarios, current perspectives, and futuristic applications. Indian J Microbiol. 2020;60:2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oakley BB, Lillehoj HS, Kogut MH, Kim WK, Maurer JJ, Pedroso A, et al. The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;360:100–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rychlik I. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals. 2020;10:103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidlerova Z, Kubasova T, Faldynova M, Crhanova M, Karasova D, Babak V, et al. Environmental impact on differential composition of gut microbiota in indoor chickens in commercial production and outdoor, backyard chickens. Microorganisms. 2020;8:767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dame-Korevaar A, Fischer EAJ, van der Goot J, Velkers F, van den Broek J, Veldman K, et al. Effect of challenge dose of plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamase and AmpC β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli on time-until-colonization and level of excretion in young broilers. Vet Microbiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiménez-Belenguer A, Doménech E, Villagrá A, Fenollar A, Ferrús MA. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth. Avian Pathol. 2016;45:501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jurburg SD, Brouwer MSM, Ceccarelli D, van der Goot J, Jansman AJM, Bossers A. Patterns of community assembly in the developing chicken microbiome reveal rapid primary succession. MicrobiologyOpen. 2019;8:e821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanikawa T, Shoji N, Sonohara N, Saito S, Shimura Y, Fukushima J, et al. Aging transition of the bacterial community structure in the chick ceca1. Poult Sci. 2011;90:1004–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Richards P, Fothergill J, Bernardeau M, Wigley P. Development of the Caecal microbiota in three broiler breeds. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ocejo M, Oporto B, Hurtado A. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing characterization of caecal microbiome composition of broilers and free-range slow-growing chickens throughout their productive lifespan. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anjum M, Madsen JS, Nesme J, Jana B, Wiese M, Jasinskyte D, et al. Fate of CMY-2-encoding plasmids introduced into the human fecal microbiota by exogenous Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02528-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong MHY, Liu L, Yan M, Chan EWC, Chen S. Dissemination of IncI2 plasmids that harbor the blaCTX-M element among clinical Salmonella isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5026–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozwandowicz M, Brouwer MSM, Fischer J, Wagenaar JA, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Guerra B, et al. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:1121–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takeshita N, Watanabe T, Ishida-Kuroki K, Sekizaki T. Transition of microbiota in chicken cecal droppings from commercial broiler farms. BMC Vet Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02688-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kers JG, Fischer EAJ, Stegeman JA, Smidt H, Velkers FC. Comparison of different invasive and non-invasive methods to characterize intestinal microbiota throughout a production cycle of broiler chickens. Microorganisms. 2019;7:431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ducarmon QR, Zwittink RD, Willems RPJ, Verhoeven A, Nooij S, van der Klis FRM, et al. Gut colonisation by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and its association with the gut microbiome and metabolome in Dutch adults: a matched case-control study. Lancet Microbe. 2022;3:e443–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dame-Korevaar A, Kers JG, van der Goot J, Velkers FC, Ceccarelli D, Mevius DJ, et al. Competitive exclusion prevents colonization and compartmentalization reduces transmission of esbl-producing Escherichia coli in broilers. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:2853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Authority (EFSA) EFS, Aerts M, Battisti A, Hendriksen R, Kempf I, Teale C, et al. Technical specifications on harmonised monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from food-producing animals and food. EFSA J. 2019;17:e05709.

    Google Scholar 

  28. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST: MIC and zone distributions and ECOFFs [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions_and_ecoffs/

  29. Dierikx CM, van Duijkeren E, Schoormans AHW, van Essen-Zandbergen A, veldman K, Kant A, et al. Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing clinical isolates derived from companion animals and horses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1368–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carattoli A, Bertini A, Villa L, Falbo V, Hopkins KL, Threlfall EJ. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;63:219–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liakopoulos A, Geurts Y, Dierikx CM, Brouwer MSM, Kant A, Wit B, et al. Extended-spectrum cephalosporin- resistant Salmonella enterica serovar heidelberg strains, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1257–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/

  33. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D590–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin H, Das PS. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oksanen J , Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin Peter R, O’Hara RB, Simpson Gavin L, Solymos Peter S, Henry SE. vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  37. Reed JF. Better binomial confidence intervals. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6:153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Devleesschauwer B, Torgerson P, Charlier J, Levecke B, Praet N, Roelandt S, et al. Prevalence: tools for prevalence assessment studies. 2015. http://cran.r-project.org/package=prevalence

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Arie Kant, Alieda van Essen, and Stephanie Vastenhouw for their technical support.

Funding

This work was funded by the Dutch Ministry for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (grants WOT-01-002-003.11 and WOT-01-002-016) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 773830). SJ was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG FZT 118).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interactions and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands

    Ingrid Cárdenas-Rey, Teresita d. J. Bello Gonzalez, Jeanet van der Goot, Daniela Ceccarelli, Danielle Schillemans, Kees T. Veldman & Michael S. M. Brouwer

  2. Gezondheidscentrum Voor Pluimvee, Emmen, The Netherlands

    Gerwin Bouwhuis

  3. Department of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Stephanie D. Jurburg

  4. Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Stephanie D. Jurburg

  5. Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Ingrid Cárdenas-Rey & J. Arjan G. M. de Visser

  6. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Michael S. M. Brouwer

Authors
  1. Ingrid Cárdenas-Rey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teresita d. J. Bello Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeanet van der Goot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniela Ceccarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gerwin Bouwhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danielle Schillemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stephanie D. Jurburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kees T. Veldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Arjan G. M. de Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael S. M. Brouwer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JVDG, DC, GB, KV and MB contributed to the design of the work. JVDG, DC, DS and GB performed the sample collection. ICR, TBG and SJ contributed to the data generation and analysis. ICR, TBG, SJ, KV, AdV and MB prepared the manuscript. All authors have revised and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. M. Brouwer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study's design was granted through the animal ethical commission at Wageningen University and Research, from the Dutch central committee on animal experiments in compliance with Dutch legislation, application number AVD4010020171486.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file1

. Overview of the broilers’ caecal samples and molecular typing of ESBL producing E. coli.

Additional file2

. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and phenotype resistance profiles of ESBL producing E. coli.

Additional file3

. Relative abundance of caecal bacterial families observed in ESBL-Ec- and ESBL-Ec+ broilers. No differential abundance between broiler groups were observed over time (ANCOM-BC, p > 0.05).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cárdenas-Rey, I., Bello Gonzalez, T.d.J., van der Goot, J. et al. Succession in the caecal microbiota of developing broilers colonised by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. anim microbiome 4, 51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00199-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00199-4

Keywords

  • Broilers
  • ESBL
  • Escherichia coli
  • Microbiota

Animal Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-4671