Skip to main content

Probiotics mediated gut microbiota diversity shifts are associated with reduction in histopathology and shedding of Lawsonia intracellularis

Abstract

Background

Clinical intervention during bacterial infections in farm animals such as pigs commonly includes the use of antimicrobials. With the rise of antimicrobial resistance and the attempts to reduce the use of antibiotics in food animals, effective alternatives are urgently needed to reduce or even remove pathogens and disease risks. Improving clinical outcomes and overall pig health by using probiotics appears attractive. However, reliable data sets on the efficacy of probiotics are scarce. The obligate intracellular bacterium Lawsonia intracellularis is widespread in pigs and associated with severe enteropathy, mainly in the ileum, commonly resulting in substantial reduction in weight gain. The impact of three in-feed probiotics and a commercial live L. intracellularis vaccine was compared in a pig challenge model. Probiotic treatment was associated with reduced L. intracellularis fecal shedding and reduced gut lesions. Here, the bacterial microbiota of the ileum of these pigs was characterized with 16S rRNA gene sequencing and was subsequently analyzed with bioinformatics tools.

Results

The greatest microbial richness was observed in the probiotic treated group T03-LAW, which accounted for 87% of richness observed in the study. Treatment had a significant impact on both the microbiota structure and taxonomic profile in the ileum, explaining between 26 and 36% of the structural variation, with the strongest association in the T03-LAW group. Overall, the largest changes were observed for the pigs treated with in-feed Bacillus pumilus; the microbiota of these pigs had the greatest diversity and highest richness. We also observed depleted and enriched core microbiota amongst the groups; however, there was no correlation with clinical characteristics. The results suggest that an increased diversity of the ileal microbiota is associated with a reduction in shedding, i.e. a unit increase in Shannon diversity index resulted in 2.8 log reduction in shedding.

Conclusions

Probiotic supplementation of a base feed ration increased ileum microbiota diversity leading to a mitigation of the effects of a pathogenic L. intracellularis challenge. An even and diverse microbiota community benefits pigs infected with L. intracellularis, however, investigations are needed to determine if this is also true for other pathogens. The study unambiguously demonstrates the usefulness of probiotic supplementation in reducing the impact of enteric pathogens and pathogen shedding rates in food animals without the use of antimicrobials.

Background

Probiotics are increasingly used in commercial food animal production and are also slowly being implemented in pork production. Interactions of diet, gut microbiota, and host appear to impact animal health and disease [1]. Common feed additives, such as dietary phytase supplementation and lactic acid treatment of cereals, drastically altered the bacterial community composition in feces of growing pigs [2]. Probiotic supplementation is thought to have a beneficial effect for pigs, however, its impact on the gut microbiome itself is less clear and is yet to be robustly investigated. Limited numbers of studies have investigated the porcine gut microbiota in the context of dietary changes. Dietary phytase supplementation affected all major bacterial taxa, but reduced species richness and diversity in fattening pigs based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of fecal DNA [3]. Shifts in the composition of the fecal microflora, in response to the administration of prebiotic lactulose, significantly increased the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio in weaned pigs [4]. At the family level, Lactobacillaceae numbers were increased after administration of the prebiotic lactulose [4]. Probiotic groups in general were found to have a lower relative abundance of Escherichia coli, suggesting that the gut microbiome of piglets may have shifted functionally and mechanistically [5]. Antimicrobials, regardless of global concerns for antibiotic resistance, are still widely used in pig farming as prophylaxis for bacterial diseases and as growth promoters in addition to therapeutic purposes [6]. Feasible and cost-effective alternatives such as probiotics, which hold much promise, are urgently needed.

Lawsonia intracellularis (L. intracellularis), an obligate intracellular bacterium with a tropism for intestinal epithelial cells, especially in the ileum [7], is of great importance in pig production [8]. In pigs, L. intracellularis is associated with ileitis, also known as proliferative enteritis, which manifests as an acute or chronic form [7]. In addition, subclinical infection of pigs is common and often remains unnoticed while impacting production and economic cost [9]. Transmission of L. intracellularis among pigs occurs by the oral fecal route [10], most pig herds are infected [8] and the disease may be exacerbated by co-infecting pathogens [11,12,13,14]. The high occurrence of L. intracellularis infection after weaning has been associated with microbial dysbiosis resulting from the change in feeding regiments [15]. Similarly, L. intracellularis infection is also known to affect the gut microbiome [11, 15, 16].

Control of L. intracellularis infection is often accomplished by either vaccination or antimicrobial treatment. High doses of antibiotics such as tiamulin, tylosin, chlortetracycline, lincomycin and olaquindox have been shown to be effective [17, 18]. Oral live and parenteral inactivated vaccines are available to control L. intracellularis [19, 20]. In vaccinated pigs, L. intracellularis shedding is not completely eliminated, regardless of vaccine type or vaccination route [21, 22]. A recent Danish study found no clear beneficial effect of vaccination against common swine pathogens including L. intracellularis and the amount of prescribed antimicrobials [23]. Moreover, there is no study to date on the effect, if any, of vaccines on the dysbiosis caused by L. intracellularis infection. In addition, there is limited knowledge on the effect of live attenuated L. intracellularis vaccine on the microbiota of the intestine [11].

In a previous controlled L. intracellularis challenge study we demonstrated  changes in a) time to onset of clinical pathology, b) levels of shedding and c) severity of shedding associated with a commercial live L. intracellularis vaccine supplemented via feed with one of three Bacillus strains and control (non-supplemented/non-vaccinated) compared to non-treated infected pigs [24]. Here we examine the changes in the aforementioned groups in relation to microbiota structure of the ileum using archived ileum content in a follow-up study. Microbiota structure and taxonomic characteristics were profiled using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing with primers targeting the prokaryotic hypervariable region 4 (V4).

Methods

Experiment design

Details on the experimental design (Table 1) and clinical findings and L. intracellularis infection characteristics including pathology and shedding results unrelated to this investigation have been published [24]. In brief, 3-week-old cross-bred pigs (the paternal line was a Hampshire descent i.e. PIC®327, while the maternal line was based on Landrace/Large White descents i.e. FAST 276) were randomly assigned to one of six treatment groups with 10–20 pigs each. The pigs were housed in four separate BSL-2 rooms with 1–3 pens (approximately 10 m2 each) of 10 pigs each equipped with a nipple waterer and a self-feeder. Specifically, the T01-LAW, T02-LAW and T03-LAW pigs were housed in a single room but in three separate pens approximately 2 m apart from each other. Similarly, the POS-CONTROL group was also housed in a single room in two separate pens. The NEG-CONTROL and VAC-LAW pigs were housed in separate single rooms with a single pen each [24]. At 3 weeks of age, the pigs were either vaccinated with a commercial oral vaccine against L. intracellularis (VAC-LAW, n = 10), were supplied feed supplemented with one of the three Bacillus probiotics (T01-LAW, B. amyloliquefaciens, n = 10; T02-LAW, B. licheniformis, n = 10; T03-LAW, B. pumilus, n = 10), or remained non-treated (NEG-CONTROL, n = 10; POS-CONTROL, n = 20). At 7 weeks of age all groups, excluding the NEG-CONTROL pigs, were challenged with gut homogenate containing L. intracellularis by gastric gavage. The gut homogenate, obtained from a commercial vendor, was produced by collecting intestines from a field pig suffering from ileitis. The affected mucosa was collected and processed (i.e. grinded and diluted), and the resulting homogenate was passaged in experimental specific pathogen free pigs to obtain mucosal scrapings with a high L. intracellularis load free of other common pig pathogens. A homogenized stock was used for inoculation of all pigs to guarantee that each pigs was equally exposed to microbial loads that potentially could have been present in the inoculum. All pigs were euthanized 16 days post L. intracellularis challenge, at approximately 9 weeks old [24].

Table 1 Experimental design

Measuring L. intracellularis infection kinetics

L. intracellularis shedding was evaluated by measuring the bacterial load in rectal swabs. Rectal swabs were collected at dpc 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 15 using polyester swabs and stored in 5 mL plastic tubes containing 1 mL of sterile saline solution at − 80 °C until testing. Testing was done using a quantitative real-time PCR specific for L. intracellularis as described [24]. Prior to analysis, genomic copy numbers were log10 transformed to normalize them. These values were used to calculate the total area under the curve (AUC) for each group, one of the outcomes utilized in this analysis. L. intracellularis associated histopathology was described using a combined ileum lesion score based on microscopic lesions and amount of L. intracellularis antigen within lesions. In brief, individual scores of crypt enterocyte hyperplasia (range from 0 = normal to 3 = marked with or without crypt herniation into the submucosa), inflammation (range from 0 = normal to 3 = marked cellular infiltrate with or without submucosal infiltrate) and amount of L. intracellularis antigen as determined by immunohistochemistry (range 0 = no signal to 3 = most crypts in most sessions with marked apical enterocyte labelling) were combined for a maximal score of 9 [24].

Sample collection and sequencing

At necropsy, luminal ileum content was collected from each pig approximately 10 cm anterior to the ileocecal junction and stored at − 80 °C until use. In addition, the inoculum stock, used to infect the pigs, was also processed and sequenced. Approximately 1 g (wet weight) of the luminal ileum content from each pig or 1 g of the challenge material was used to extract genomic DNA using PowerMag DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc. Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the DNA was assessed by Qubit 4 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The 16S rRNA amplicon library was prepared as described [25] with minor modifications. Briefly, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform with v2 MiSeq cartridges to produce 2 × 250 bp paired end reads. DNA was amplified by using the 515f/806r primer set forward V4 (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and reverse V4 (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT). The primers for library preparation were designed based on the V4 primers, multiplex indices and Illumina adapter sequences. Extracted genomic DNA was PCR amplified with Schloss lab indices and AccuPrime™ Pfx SuperMix (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, annealing at 55 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The prepared library was purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads, (Beckman Coulter®, Brea, CA, USA). Libraries were quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The pooled library was fed into the sequencing workflow with 15% PhiX control library at a final concentration of 4pM, using MiSeq Reagent Nano kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) for a 500 cycle (2 × 250 bp) run. Custom sequencing primers designed on the V4 region were utilized during the sequencing procedure, together with MiSeq sequencing primers (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) as follows: read 1 primer (TATGGTAATTGTGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA), read 2 primer (AGTCAGTCAGCCGGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) and index primer (ATTAGAWACCCBDGTAGTCCGGCTGACTGACT). Raw data was de-multiplexed based on dual indices to generate two FASTQ files, R1 and R2, for each sample.

Sequence processing using QIIME-2

The paired end reads from the sequencing step above were processed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology-2™ (QIIME-2) software [26]. The raw reads and the corresponding experimental metadata were combined using a manifest generated QIIME-2 analysis file. The reads were then de-replicated and chimeric sequences were removed before the denoising was done in DADA2 [26]. The resultant feature tables were used to identify the appropriate sequence depth at which the subsequent analyses would be performed. In addition, output data from a rarefaction analysis step was used to identify and remove spurious sequences at the appropriate sequence depth. Alpha and beta diversity indices as well as the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) phylogenetic were obtained by following the QIIME-2 workflow [26]. OTU taxonomic classification was done using a naïve Bayes classifier trained on the SILVA database (vMarch 2020) at 97% similarity [27]. First, a training dataset using the sequencing primers was extracted. The classifier was then used after the training to assign taxonomy to our OTU dataset.

Ileal microbiota structure analysis

The analysis of the microbiota community structure was based on characteristics of the alpha and beta diversities. In brief, data from QIIME-2 was exported into the R statistical package (v3.5.1). Four files, including the taxonomic map, the OTU biome table, the experimental metadata and the rooted phylogenetic tree, were combined to generate a phyloseq object [28] which was used for downstream analysis. To analyze the alpha diversity, we first normalized the taxa abundance using the “relative” option in the normalize_data function from the “microbiome” R package [29]. Then the plot_anova-diversity function from the same package was used with the adjusted level of significance set at ≤0.05 for species richness (observed OTU count), the Simpson index and the Shannon index [30]. Pairwise comparison between treatment and each alpha index was done using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test with a significant p-value set at < 0.05 [31]. We also explored four beta diversity indices, i.e. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), double principal coordinate analysis (DPCoA), and weighted UniFrac distances, to characterize the impact of treatment on microbiota structure [32,33,34]. Each of these beta diversity indices exploits slightly different aspects of the microbiota structure and a comparative examination of these tools allowed us to determine the extent to which community structural variations are explained by treatment or sex.

Treatment or sex associated microbial structural changes

To assess multivariate associations of experimental factors and microbial structural changes, a permutation multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) model with the Adonis function (9999 permutations) was used in the “microbiome” package in R. Here a model was run for each of the beta diversity indices with the aim to assess the individual and cumulative variation explained by the factors (sex, treatment) used in this study.

Taxonomic profiles of ileal microbiota

The “metacoder” package (v0.3.2) in R [35] was used to profile the ileal microbial taxonomy, and taxonomic assignments (pan-phylogenetic) and their abundances (heat tree) were plotted based on treatment. This allowed for visualization of changes in abundance of each phylogenetic tree branches in each treatment group. In addition, mean abundances per family were computed and visualized using the “ComplexHeatmap” package (v2.5.1) as described [36]. The assumption for this analysis was if the hierarchical clustering of taxa recapitulates the treatment groups, then there should be a strong relationship between the taxonomic profiles and treatment groups [37].

Comparison between L. intracellularis clinical characteristics and ileal microbiota

To identify any relationship between the microbiota characteristics and the clinical signs of infection, i.e. histopathology and fecal shedding of L. intracellularis [24], we used a correlation analysis and the multinomial logistic regression to fit a model using the “ggbupr package (v0.4.0) in R. First, we assessed the correlation between shedding and histopathology, then examined how each is associated with primary microbiota parameters such as abundance, diversity and richness as well as secondary parameters such as clustering. Parameters and characteristics were defined as directly or inversely correlated and a statistical significance of p < 0.05 determined the significance of the association. This allowed us to identify treatment-mediated parameters associated with reduced shedding and histopathology.

Results

Summary description of the study group

A total of 70 pigs, sero-negative for L. intracellularis, were included. Each group contained 10 animals, excluding the POS-CONTROL group which contained 20 animals. The pigs were purchased from a commercial farm in the Midwest of the US and were cross-bred pigs. Overall, 54.3% (38/70) of the pigs were male and 45.7% (32/70) were female. Samples used for this study were collected from 9-week-old pigs of which the majority had been experimentally challenged with L. intracellularis 16 days earlier. They spent 44 days on their specific diet with or without probiotic supplementation.

Infection kinetics and pathology associated with L. intracellularis

On arrival, all pigs were free of L. intracellularis antibodies and DNA as determined by ELISA on serum and PCR on fecal samples [24]. By the time of inoculation 4 weeks after L. intracellularis vaccination, all VAC-LAW pigs had seroconverted and, at necropsy, 10–65% of the pigs in all other challenged groups were also seropositive. Successful L. intracellularis challenge was confirmed by a high prevalence of pigs shedding L. intracellularis with the highest bacterial DNA levels detected in POS-CONTROL pigs, VAC-LAW pigs and T01-LAW pigs (Additional file 1). There was a delay in onset of shedding in T02-LAW and T03-LAW groups, which was reflected in less severe macroscopic and microscopic lesions (Additional file 2), reduced intralesional L. intracellularis antigen levels and a lower area under the curve for bacterial shedding [24].

16S rRNA gene sequencing output statistics

From the tissue homogenate used for inoculation of the pigs, a total of 127 bacterial taxa were identified of which 108/127 taxa contributed less than 1% of the overall population (Additional file 3). L. intracellularis accounted for 37.5% of the taxonomic abundances in the  inoculum. From the 70 ileal content samples, 4.4 million sequences were generated, 89% of which had a quality score of Q30 and above. Preliminary assessment without a sequence depth filter showed that the sequences clustered into 2241 unique OTUs with an average frequency of 57,237. At an even sampling depth of 10,000, 69 samples and 1025 unique OTUs were retained, and their distribution according to treatment is shown in Fig. 1. The refraction curves in Fig. 1a indicate that T03-LAW pigs and the NEG-CONTROL pigs had a higher diversity (Shannon index); indeed, the former had nearly four times the observed OTU count as compared to the VAC-LAW group. Similarly, and as indicated in Fig. 1b, ileal content from male pigs appeared to have a higher diversity (Shannon index); however, this was not statistically significant compared to female pigs.

Fig. 1
figure1

Changes in the ileal microbial structure associated with treatment groups. a Rarefaction curves of alpha diversity indices, i.e. observed OTUs and Shannon index, grouped by treatment. b Rarefaction curves of alpha diversity indices grouped by gender. c Boxplots of pairwise comparison of the treatment alpha diversity indices using Wilcoxon’s non-parametric test where asterisks represent an adjusted P value less than 0.05*, 0.001**, 0.0001***. d Boxplots of the gender alpha diversity indices

Microbiota structure of the ileum

Alpha diversity

The mean species richness, Simpson index, and Shannon index across all groups were 93, 0.53 and 1.9, respectively. A comparison between groups showed significant differences (p < 0.001) in all three alpha diversity indices as shown in Fig. 1c except richness between NEG-CONTROL and POS-CONTROL groups. A significant difference in diversity was evident between NEG-CONTROL and POS-CONTROL pigs. However, the largest differences were observed between T03-LAW and POS-CONTROL. Although significant differences in richness existed between T03-LAW and VAC-LAW for the  Shannon index, the same was not true for the Simpson index. There were no statistical differences between male and female pigs (Fig. 1d). Overall these results suggest that treatment was associated with an individual’s microbiota variations, however there was no impact of sex.

Beta diversity

Distinct clustering, corresponding to treatment, disappeared when increasing the total explained variance (Fig. 2). For example, clustering disappears at 69.9% (Fig. 2c), but is discernable between 11 and 20.8% (Fig. 2a and b), suggesting that the upper limit of variance attributable to treatment groups is between 20.8 and 69.9%. Note here that clustering is much more defined for pigs in the T03-LAW group, while T01-LAW and T02-LAW share a cluster, and the NEG-CONTROL, POS-CONTROL and VAC-LAW groups share the remaining cluster. The multivariable analysis of association was therefore restricted to the first three beta diversity indices.

Fig. 2
figure2

Comparative analysis between beta diversity indices and treatment groups. a-c Indication of the level of clustering and how treatment groups map to gender. d The level of clustering by treatment as a proxy for how much variation is explained by treatment group

The PerMANOVA analysis (Table 2) indeed shows that treatment as an experimental variable explained 26.8, 28.8 and 35.7% of the variation in microbiota structure as estimated using the Bray-Curtis index, Jensen-Shannon divergence, and DPCoA distances, respectively. This agrees with the univariate analysis in Fig. 2 and suggests that treatment explained 27–36% of the microbial structural variation. Therefore, since treatment here is associated with changes in alpha and/or and beta diversities, treatment significantly impacted structural changes in the ileal microbiota.

Table 2 Results of the PerMANOVA analysis using beta diversity indexes

Taxonomic profiles of ileum microbiota

The 1025 OTUs clustered into 14 phyla, 85 families and 178 genera. At the phylum level Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes accounted for more than 75% of the abundance, other phyla included Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. At the family level, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Clostridiaceae, and Lactobacillaceae were the most abundant. The heat trees in Additional file 4 show the phylogenetic relationships of ileal microbiota by treatment i.e. thick dark green branches represent the core microbes. T03-LAW had an overall enrichment shown as thick dark green branches through the heat tree (Additional file 4), indeed T03-LAW accounted for 87% of the OTUs and genera observed in this study. On more granular or closer analysis, the enrichment exhibited by T03-LAW is discernible as cluster 1 (Fig. 3), although a few T03-LAW pigs are also present in clusters 2 and 3 (Fig. 3). The core, i.e. genera observed in 85% of the samples, was composed of 38 genera including Clostridium, Lawsonia, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium and others. In this regard we also observed that clusters 1 and 3 had an enriched core whereas cluster 5 had a depleted core (Fig. 3). In summary, clustering by taxonomic abundance was mainly associated with T03-LAW, which also exhibited the highest taxonomic diversity.

Fig. 3
figure3

The genus level microbial richness characterized in this study clustered by abundance levels. The clusters are linked to the treatment groups and sex. Note that the first 38 genera on the x-axis represent the core i.e. genera present in at least 85% of the individuals

Ileal microbiota and clinical characteristics of L. intracellularis

A direct correlation between histopathology in the ileum and fecal shedding of L. intracellularis is demonstrated in Fig. 4a. This relationship varied for the individuals in each of the five clusters defined in Fig. 3. For example, the highest diversity is present in cluster 1 (almost exclusively made up by T03-LAW), and core enrichment is present in cluster 3 whereas core depletion can be noted in cluster 5. In general, cluster 1 was associated with lower histopathology scores and shedding. It appears that changing the core genera population does not directly lead to a change in clinical presentation. Cluster 4 was dominated by members of the POS-CONTROL group. Generally, there was a discernible relationship between microbial abundance and clinical characteristics (shedding and histopathology) (Fig. 4c and e), however at the family level, there were significant correlations with Clostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichacea and Streptococeae (Fig. 4d and f). The direction of these correlations varied, for example an inverse correlation was seen between clinical characteristics and the abundance of Clostridiaceae for all treatment groups except for the NEG-CONTROL group which showed a flat (neutral) correlation for shedding and the histopathology score. The unit increase in abundance of Streptoccocaeae and Erysipelotrichacea was associated with a 0.25–0.35 and 0.24–0.32 log reduction in shedding and histopathology respectively (Fig. 4d and f). In groups T01-LAW, T03-LAW and VAC-LAW the abundance of Streptococcaceae was inversely correlated to shedding and histopathology, whereas the NEG-CONTROL group as well as the POS-CONTROL group, when looking at shedding only, showed no correlation with clinical signs. The opposite seems to be true for Erysipelotrichacea, where only T02-LAW and T03-LAW show a neutral correlation whereas the POS-CONTROL is inversely correlated. An inverse correlation was also observed for Rummincococeae (T01-LAW, T02-LAW, T03-LAW, VAC-LAW), Coriobacteriaceae (T01-LAW, T02-LAW, T03-LAW, VAC-LAW, POS-CONTROL for shedding and family abundance only) and Peptostreptococaceae (T01-LAW, T02-LAW, T03-LAW for histology and family abundance only, VAC-LAW, POS-CONTROL) (Additional files 5 and 6). An inverse correlation between shedding and the diversity of the ileal microbiota was identified (Fig. 5a). Indeed, a unit increase in the Shannon index was associated with a 2.8 log reduction of L. intracellular is DNA copy numbers shed in the feces. The direction of this relation was heavily influenced by T01-LAW. Although T03-LAW, T02-LAW and VAC-LAW exhibit a direct relationship, T03-LAW and to some extent also T02-LAW were characterized by lower levels of shedding. Critically, for shedding both control groups exhibit a neutral relationship between clinical characteristics and diversity which suggests that the observed effect is due to the treatment. It is noteworthy that the correlation between histopathology and diversity was not statistically significant (p = 0.063) but the trends were similar compared to shedding.

Fig. 4
figure4

Association between Lawsonia intracellularis phenotypes i.e. histopathology and shedding and ilea microbiota taxonomic abundance (log10) at the family level. All treatment groups are color coded. R represents the correlation coefficient and the corresponding P value. a shows the relationship between shedding and pathology (microscopic ileum score) and b shows how this varies depending on taxonomic clustering and treatment group. c Overall comparison of shedding (log10) and microbial abundance. d Same relationship as in A faceted by selected number of microbial families (full profile in Additional files 4 and 5). e Overall comparison of pathology (microscopic ileum score) and microbial abundance. f Same relationship as in c faceted by selected families

Fig. 5
figure5

Relationship between L. intracellularis phenotype, including a shedding and b histopathology (microscopic ileum score), and their corresponding ileal microbiota diversity. Groups are colored by treatment and R represents the correlation coefficient and the corresponding p value

Discussion

In this study, ileum microbiota characteristics in L. intracellularis infected pigs under different experimental treatment regiments were defined and characterized. We specifically compared possible prophylactic interventions to prevent L. intracellularis associated disease as opposed to traditional therapeutic methods such as antibiotic treatment. In future it may be worthwhile to repeat this study and to add a traditional antimicrobial treatment as an additional group. The ileum, as the primary site of L. intracellularis infection in pigs [38], was the selected anatomical location in this study. Our approach consisted of collecting ileum content from 9-week-old pigs, 16 days after experimental infection with L. intracellularis and 44 days post commercial L. intracellularis vaccination (VAC-LAW) or the start of three different probiotics (T01-LAW, T02-LAW, T03-LAW) which were added to the regular base diet given to pigs in all groups. This differs from other L. intracellularis studies focusing on the enteric microbiome which investigated fecal [11] or caecum and colon microbiota [16], or analyzed the distal ileum content using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism [15] and provides a broad snapshot of L. intracellularis infection dynamics at the site of colonization. We specifically examined the bacterial community as earlier L. intracellularis experiments in gnotobiotic pigs suggested that a certain microbial background is required for L. intracellularis infection to establish [38]. The factor “treatment” was used to analyze the changes in ileum microbiota using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We then linked observed changes to clinical phenotypes of L. intracellularis infection including fecal shedding and histopathology in the ileum. Overall, we observed a strong association between treatment and changes in ileum microbiota structure based on alpha diversity indices. These changes were significant and not limited to richness (i.e. the number of unique OTUs) but also to evenness and relative abundance. For example, richness was highest in T03-LAW and lowest in VAC-LAW (Fig. 1c). However, VAC-LAW had a higher average Simpson index compared to T01-LAW even though the unique OTU count in VAC-LAW was significantly lower. It remains puzzling why, in this study, the vaccinated group had the lowest OTU count but at the same time had a more even distribution of bacteria and how this impacted the overall outcome. A more even and diverse ileum microbiota may be beneficial for pigs infected with L. intracellularis as has been observed in relation with other pathogens [39, 40]. Microbiota changes were associated with specific clinical phenotypes as shown in the downstream analysis; specifically, increased diversity was associated with reduced histopathology lesions and fecal shedding. It is likely that the presence of specific organisms in T03-LAW pigs resulted in the desired effect on clinical presentation. It has been previously shown that AUC measurements and shedding duration were significantly increased in VAC-LAW pigs compared to T02-LAW and T03-LAW pigs; 40% of the VAC-LAW pigs had severe microscopic ileum lesions compared to 10% of T02-LAW and 0% of T03-LAW animals [24]. The reason for these previous observations is unknown. T01 was supplemented with B. amyloliquefaciens, T02 was supplemented with B. licheniformis, and T03 was given B. pumilus. While these all belong to the Bacillus species, it is well acknowledged in the probiotic literature that even members of the same species, i.e., different strains, differ in their properties and utility as a probiotics [41]. Additional in vivo but also in vitro studies are required to confirm the obtained results and to define the effect/mechanism of each of these Bacillus species on the microbiome and more specifically on L. intracellularis to identify possible mechanisms leading to reduction of L. intracellularis infection, shedding and lesions.

Similarly, we exploited the subtle methodological differences in analyzing beta diversity to define a range of variation likely attributable to treatment. Specifically, in this study, treatment explained between 26 and 36% of the population variation. To put this in context, the effect size of probiotic treatment is similar to the effect size of bile acid on the intestinal microbiome [42]. In this regard, the largest change in beta diversity was seen for T03-LAW while changes for T01-LAW and T02-LAW were similar, hence the co-clustering.

Our approach assumed that clustering by richness and abundance corresponding to treatment is indicative of a strong taxonomic effect for the experiment. The extent to which treatment impacted the ileal microbial structure differed for each group. These differences potentially define the exploitable usefulness of these treatments, specifically in augmenting clinical outcomes to control L. intracelluaris in pig herds. For example, significant differences were observed between POS-CONTROL and NEG-CONTROL for the alpha diversity indices and  discernible clusters were identified for the beta diversity indices. However, intriguingly, the microbial structural changes between POS-CONTROL and VAC-LAW were comparable. Members of the T03-LAW almost exclusively grouped in cluster 1 (Fig. 3) which accounts for a considerable amount of the overall observed richness. This dramatic increase in richness was associated with lower shedding and lower histopathology scores. T03-LAW appears to break the direct relationship (positive correlation) observed in all other L. intracellularis infected pigs between shedding and histopathology. The mechanisms for this are currently unknown but among other reasons could be due to a direct interaction of probiotic bacteria (or their metabolites) with either L. intracellularis, the established microbiome, or both. Alternatively, other microorganisms, induced by the probiotic bacteria or their metabolites, could have a major impact. Also, the probiotic bacteria could directly affect the protective biofilm formation on the enteric mucosal surface, such as changing the redox potential, resulting in an unfavorable environment for L. intracellularis. It may also be beneficial to increase the microbiota richness for the robustness of a niche in warding off a pathogen invasion. It is recognized that enteric pathogens, including L. intracellularis, have the potential to alter the bile acid metabolism [43]. Physiologically, 95% of bile salts are reabsorbed by the jejunum and ileum epithelium by active and passive transport and the small intestinal microbiome plays a major role in the bile acid metabolism [44]. Hence, it is likely that the bile acid metabolism is affected by the damage to the small intestinal epithelium due to L. intracellularis infection, the disruption of the physiological microbiome (dysbiosis) at that site brought on by the infection or both [15]. The favorable microbial composition and increased microbial diversity associated with probiotic treatment could mitigate L. intracellularis infection by impacting the bile acid metabolism and other similar physiological processes. In this particular context further research is required to identify the microbial combination of probiotics and mechanistic basis for these effects.

Shifts in the ileal core genera were associated with changes in the threshold for shedding level, i.e. the clusters with the most depleted core (cluster 5) and the most enriched cores (clusters 1 and 3). This suggests that depleting the ileal core genera results in a higher threshold for shedding. It is difficult to compare the core genera across studies. Besides age, commonly studies are done in pigs around weaning [45, 46], housing and diet may also impact core genera. Moreover, it has been recently determined that when defining the core microbiome in pigs, differences in study protocols have a significant impact and standardization of experimental techniques appear to be important [47]. Nevertheless, using a meta-analysis of 20 data sets, several shared genera such as Prevotella, Clostridium, Alloprevotella, and Ruminococcus were identified [47]. A more recent study, based on analysis of freshly collected feces, identified a pig core microbiome of 69 bacterial features present in all growth stages [48]. Besides confirming the earlier core genera findings, at the family level the top three families were Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Lactobacillaceae [48]. The analysis in this study does not suggest a major effect of the core microbiota on clinical presentation other than threshold differences in shedding detection (cluster 3 enriched and cluster 5 depleted in Fig. 4b).

In this study it was established that a direct relationship exists between pathology and shedding and identifying microbial factors that disrupt it provides a foundation for limiting the impact of this infection. The precise mechanism of this microbial interaction is unknown. The data obtained here will be useful to design future experiments in an attempt to further reduce bacterial shedding and pathology. This perhaps could advance probiotic supplementation to limit the impact of infectious diseases in food production. Limiting pathology arguably reduces not only the adverse effects on an animal’s productivity but also shedding and thus limits transmission to other pigs. In this regard, T03-LAW (cluster 1) appears to be the only treatment group in which the shedding dynamics were reduced. At the family level, a log increase in abundance of Clostridiaceae, Streptoccaceae or Erysipelatricheae was associated with 3.9, 3.1 and 3.4 log reduction in copies of L. intracellularis shedding and pathology rank, respectively. In particular, reduction in shedding and pathology in the VAC-LAW group appeared to be influenced by the increase in abundance of Clostridiaceae. A similar but weaker relationship was noted for T01-LAW and T02-LAW. In a previous study, analysis of the microbiota of L. intracellular is vaccinated pigs showed that vaccination led to changes in the abundance of Clostridium species, including Clostridium butyricum [11] which is in agreement with the results of this study. However, an increase in abundance of the three aforementioned families was not associated with shedding or pathology (reduction or increase) for T03-LAW.

An increase of one unit in the Shannon diversity index resulted in a 2.8 log reduction in shedding in this study. In other words, by increasing diversity one could reduce shedding of L. intracellularis. In addition to T03-LAW, a reduction in shedding associated with increased diversity was also evident for T01-LAW and T02-LAW. An increase in diversity was however associated with increased shedding among VAC-LAW pigs and this still requires an explanation. Perhaps this could reflect the effect of a longer term dysbiosis as the VAC-LAW group was first exposed to attenuated L. intracellularis before being exposed to pathogenic L. intracellularis challenge. In addition, the VAC-LAW group did manifest associated changes in the ileal microbiota after L. intracellularis challenge (Additional file 4) which warrants further studies. Crucially, the comparison between clinical phenotypes and ileal microbiota diversity showed that both control groups (NEG-CONTROL, POS-CONTROL) were not affected by this relationship. The direction and strength of the relationships observed with a treatment, i.e. the associated microbial community, therefore reflects its true impact.

In this study the pigs were not challenged with a pure L. intracellularis inoculum obtained by in vitro culture but rather with ileum mucosa scrapings, from a commercial vendor, containing L. intracellularis obtained from pigs deliberately infected under experimental conditions to produce the inoculum stock. This was done because in vitro propagation of L. intracellularis is difficult and only successfully performed in few labs worldwide [17, 49], wild-type strains are often attenuated after passaging [50], and clinical ileitis can be difficult to reproduce with pure cultured inoculum [51] with some exemptions [52]. The important comparisons in this study were between the T01-LAW, T02-LAW, T03-LAW and POS-CONTROL groups which all received an identical inoculum. 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing obtained from the inoculum indicate that 37.5% of the stock was L. intracellularis whereas other bacteria where only present in small percentages (Additional file 3).

A potential application of the study findings includes microbiota augmentation to modify pathology, shedding and, by extension, L. intracellularis transmission. This may have profound implications for the dependence on antibiotic use to control infectious diseases in livestock production systems. However, extensive research will be required to optimize probiotics (and likely also prebiotics) outside the realm of controlled experimentation. Ultimately such scalable innovation means livestock will be raised without adverse environmental effects while also minimizing the contribution to the evolution of antibiotic resistance. In this regard, our findings indicate the potential usefulness of microbial families such as Clostridiaceae, Streptoccaceae, Erysipelatricheae, Rummincococeae, Coriobacteriaceae and Peptostreptococaceae in augmenting clinical outcomes during L. intracellularis infections.

Conclusions

In this study, significant effects on the ileal microbiota structure were observed during experimental infection of pigs with L. intracellularis, either with prophylactic treatment in the form of a commercial live L. intracellularis vaccine or in-feed probiotics. These changes exhibited as taxonomic shifts and included, but were not limited to, core and accessory genera depletion or enrichment. We observed that microbial changes such as diversity and richness had an inverse correlation with clinical characteristics such as ileal histopathology and fecal shedding. The extent to which this relation manifested varied depending on treatment, which raises the potential for using microbial manipulation to decrease pathology and shedding. Modulating these clinical parameters appears to be the foundation to limiting disease transmission as well as promoting individual animal resilience to disease. Further studies need to be done to explore the causal relationship and underlying mechanism(s) of probiotic feed supplementation on L. intracellularis induced ileal lesions. To unravel the complex associations between microbial diversity and L. intracellularis infection/pathogenesis, a longitudinal pig study with suitable design, such as sampling at different time points by staggered sacrifice of pigs within a group, introduction of the probiotic feed intervention at different time points before or after L. intracellularis infection, or ileal content transfer in addition to other tools would also be required.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available in the BioProject repository, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/660793.

Abbreviations

16S rRNA:

16S ribosomal RNA

AUC:

Area under the curve

bp:

Base pair

BSL-2:

Biosafety level 2

CFU:

Colony forming unit

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

dpc:

Day post challenge

DPCoA:

Double principal coordinate analysis

DF:

Degree of freedom

g:

Gram

JSD:

Jensen-Shannon divergence

L. intracellularis :

Lawsonia intracellularis

min:

Minute

mL:

Milliliter

NEG-CONTROL:

Negative control group not treated or challenged

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PerMANOVA:

Permutation multivariate analysis of variance

POS-CONTROL:

Positive control group, not treated but infected with L. intracellularis

sec:

Second

T01-LAW:

Supplemented with B. amyloliquefaciens and infected with L. intracellularis

T02-LAW:

Supplemented with B. licheniformis and infected with L. intracellularis

T03-LAW:

Supplemented with B. pumilus and infected with L. intracellularis

VAC-LAW:

Vaccinated against L. intracellularis and infected with L. intracellularis

References

  1. 1.

    Aluthge ND, Van Sambeek DM, Carney-Hinkle EE, Li YS, Fernando SC, Burkey TE. Board invited review: the pig microbiota and the potential for harnessing the power of the microbiome to improve growth and health. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(9):3741–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Klinsoda J, Vötterl J, Zebeli Q, Metzler-Zebeli BU. Lactic acid treatment of cereals and dietary phytase modified fecal microbiome composition without affecting expression of virulence factor genes in growing pigs. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2345.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Metzler-Zebeli BU, Klinsoda J, Vötterl JC, Verhovsek D. Maturational changes alter effects of dietary phytase supplementation on the fecal microbiome in fattening pigs. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1073.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Han GG, Lee JY, Jin GD, Park J, Choi YH, Chae BJ, et al. Evaluating the association between body weight and the intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets via 16S rRNA sequencing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(14):5903–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chae JP, Pajarillo EAB, Oh JK, Kim H, Kang D-K. Revealing the combined effects of lactulose and probiotic enterococci on the swine faecal microbiota using 454 pyrosequencing. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;9(4):486–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cuong NV, Padungtod P, Thwaites G, Carrique-Mas JJ. Antimicrobial usage in animal production: a review of the literature with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. Antibiotics. 2018;7(3):75.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lawson GH, Gebhart CJ. Proliferative enteropathy. J Comp Pathol. 2000;122(2–3):77–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Arnold M, Crienen A, Swam H, von Berg S, Jolie R, Nathues H. Prevalence of Lawsonia intracellularis in pig herds in different European countries. Porcine Health Manag. 2019;5(1):31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Brandt D, Kaim U, Baumgartner W, Wendt M. Evaluation of Lawsonia intracellularis infection in a group of pigs in a subclinically affected herd from weaning to slaughter. Vet Microbiol. 2010;146(3–4):361–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Love RJ, Love DN. Control of proliferative haemorrhagic enteropathy in pigs. Vet Rec. 1977;100(22):473.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leite FLL, Singer RS, Ward T, Gebhart CJ, Isaacson RE. Vaccination against Lawsonia intracellularis decreases shedding of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in co-infected pigs and alters the gut microbiome. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2857.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Opriessnig T, Madson DM, Roof M, Layton SM, Ramamoorthy S, Meng XJ, et al. Experimental reproduction of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2)-associated enteritis in pigs infected with PCV2 alone or concurrently with Lawsonia intracellularis or Salmonella typhimurium. J Comp Pathol. 2011;145(2–3):261–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Matsubayashi M, Kanamori K, Sadahiro M, Tokoro M, Abe N, Haritani M, et al. First molecular identification of Entamoeba polecki in a piglet in Japan and implications for aggravation of ileitis by coinfection with Lawsonia intracellularis. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(8):3069–73.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Komine M, Cunha TO, Mullaney TP, Smedley RC, Langohr IM. Pathology in practice. Proliferative and necrotizing enterocolitis in a pig resulting from coinfection with L intracellularis and S enterica. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;248(8):897–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mølbak L, Johnsen K, Boye M, Jensen TK, Johansen M, Møller K, et al. The microbiota of pigs influenced by diet texture and severity of Lawsonia intracellularis infection. Vet Microbiol. 2008;128(1–2):96–107.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Borewicz KA, Kim HB, Singer RS, Gebhart CJ, Sreevatsan S, Johnson T, et al. Changes in the porcine intestinal microbiome in response to infection with Salmonella enterica and Lawsonia intracellularis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wattanaphansak S, Pereira CER, Kaenson W, Assavacheep P, Tantilertcharoen R, Resende TP, et al. Isolation and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of porcine Lawsonia intracellularis from Brazil and Thailand. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pereira CER, Resende TP, Vasquez E, Marshall-Lund L, Guedes RMC, Gebhart CJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity against equine Lawsonia intracellularis strains. Equine Vet J. 2019;51(5):665–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guedes RM, Gebhart CJ. Onset and duration of fecal shedding, cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in pigs after challenge with a pathogenic isolate or attenuated vaccine strain of Lawsonia intracellularis. Vet Microbiol. 2003;91(2–3):135–45.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roerink F, Morgan CL, Knetter SM, Passat MH, Archibald AL, Ait-Ali T, et al. A novel inactivated vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis induces rapid induction of humoral immunity, reduction of bacterial shedding and provides robust gut barrier function. Vaccine. 2018;36(11):1500–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Riber U, Heegaard PM, Cordes H, Stahl M, Jensen TK, Jungersen G. Vaccination of pigs with attenuated Lawsonia intracellularis induced acute phase protein responses and primed cell-mediated immunity without reduction in bacterial shedding after challenge. Vaccine. 2015;33(1):156–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jacobs AAC, Harks F, Hazenberg L, Hoeijmakers MJH, Nell T, Pel S, et al. Efficacy of a novel inactivated Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine in pigs against experimental infection and under field conditions. Vaccine. 2019;37(15):2149–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kruse AB, de Knegt LV, Nielsen LR, Alban L. No clear effect of initiating vaccination against common endemic infections on the amounts of prescribed antimicrobials for Danish weaner and finishing pigs during 2007-2013. Front Vet Sci. 2016;3:120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Opriessnig T, Karuppannan AK, Beckler D, Ait-Ali T, Cubas-Atienzar A, Halbur PG. Bacillus pumilus probiotic feed supplementation mitigates Lawsonia intracellularis shedding and lesions. Vet Res. 2019;50(1):85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(17):5112–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61217.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. Malden: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lahti L, Shetty S, et al. Introduction to the microbiome R package. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xia Y, Sun J, Chen D-G. Statistical analysis of microbiome data with R. Berlin: Springer; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nielsen F. On a generalization of the Jensen-Shannon divergence and the JS-symmetrization of distances relying on abstract means, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.04017; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Legendre P, De Cáceres M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett. 2013;16(8):951–63.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pavoine S, Dufour AB, Chessel D. From dissimilarities among species to dissimilarities among communities: a double principal coordinate analysis. J Theor Biol. 2004;228(4):523–37.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Foster ZS, Sharpton TJ, Grünwald NJ. Metacoder: an R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(2):e1005404.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(18):2847–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Embrechts MJ, Gatti CJ, Linton J, Roysam B. Hierarchical clustering for large data sets. In: Georgieva P, Mihaylova L, Jain L, editors. Advances in intelligent signal processing and data mining. Studies in computational intelligence. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28696-4_8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    McOrist S, Jasni S, Mackie RA, MacIntyre N, Neef N, Lawson GH. Reproduction of porcine proliferative enteropathy with pure cultures of ileal symbiont intracellularis. Infect Immun. 1993;61(10):4286–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nowland TL, Plush KJ, Barton M, Kirkwood RN. Development and function of the intestinal microbiome and potential implications for pig production. Animals. 2019;9(3):76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fouhse JM, Zijlstra RT, Willing BP. The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Anim Front. 2016;6(3):30–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ramos CL, Thorsen L, Schwan RF, Jespersen L. Strain-specific probiotics properties of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis isolates from Brazilian food products. Food Microbiol. 2013;36(1):22–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang L, Wu W, Lee YK, Xie J, Zhang H. Spatial heterogeneity and co-occurrence of mucosal and luminal microbiome across swine intestinal tract. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Molinero N, Ruiz L, Sánchez B, Margolles A, Delgado S. Intestinal bacteria interplay with bile and cholesterol metabolism: implications on host physiology. Front Physiol. 2019;10:185.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ridlon JM, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB, Bajaj JS. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30(3):332–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yang Q, Huang X, Wang P, Yan Z, Sun W, Zhao S, et al. Longitudinal development of the gut microbiota in healthy and diarrheic piglets induced by age-related dietary changes. Microbiol. 2019;8(12):e923.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pena Cortes LC, LeVeque RM, Funk JA, Marsh TL, Mulks MH. Development of the tonsil microbiome in pigs and effects of stress on the microbiome. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:220.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Holman DB, Brunelle BW, Trachsel J, Allen HK. Meta-analysis to define a core microbiota in the swine gut. mSystems. 2017;2(3):e00004–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li Y, Wang X, Wang X-Q, Wang J, Zhao J. Life-long dynamics of the swine gut microbiome and their implications in probiotics development and food safety. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(6):1824–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vannucci FA, Wattanaphansak S, Gebhart CJ. An alternative method for cultivation of Lawsonia intracellularis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):1070–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Vannucci FA, Beckler D, Pusterla N, Mapes SM, Gebhart CJ. Attenuation of virulence of Lawsonia intracellularis after in vitro passages and its effects on the experimental reproduction of porcine proliferative enteropathy. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162(1):265–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    McOrist S, Gebhart CJ, Bosworth BT. Evaluation of porcine ileum models of enterocyte infection by Lawsonia intracellularis. Can J Vet Res. 2006;70(2):155–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Guedes RM, Gebhart CJ. Comparison of intestinal mucosa homogenate and pure culture of the homologous Lawsonia intracellularis isolate in reproducing proliferative enteropathy in swine. Vet Microbiol. 2003;93(2):159–66.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ganwu Li and Huigang Shen for assistance with the sequencing which was performed at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Funding

TO and AM are supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) through the Roslin Institute Strategic Programme “Control of Infectious Diseases” (BBS/E/D/20002173 and BBS/E/D/20002174). AM is also supported by BBSRC Future Leader Fellowship (BB/P007767/1) and University of Edinburgh’s ISSF3 (1S3-RI.0919/20).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TO designed the experiment, TO and AK performed the experiment and collected the samples, AM performed the microbiota analysis and data interpretation, and all authors drafted the manuscript and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Opriessnig.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol was approved by the Iowa State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval Number 3-17-8475-S) and the Iowa State University Institutional Biosafety Committee (Approval Number 17-I-0011-A). Environmental enrichment of pens was utilized and all pigs were under independent veterinary supervision.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

Number of positive pigs/total pigs per group (group mean ± SEM) for log10 L. intracellularis DNA in rectal swabs at different days post L. intracellularis challenge [24]. Different superscripts (A,B,C) indicate significantly different group means on a certain day.

Additional file 2.

Association of histopathology and shedding for each of the treatment groups.

Additional file 3.

Taxa and percentage of bacteria present the inoculum used to challenge the pigs.

Additional file 4.

Taxonomic characteristics of ileal microbiota. OTUs clustered according to their phylogenetic relationship and colored by abundance, also called a heat-tree. The core microbes can be identified by the dark green backbone while the transient/accessory microbes compose the rest of the tree branches and change by treatment groups.

Additional file 5.

Taxonomic association with shedding. The relationship between shedding and the abundance of individual families colored by treatment group is demonstrated.

Additional file 6.

Taxonomic association with pathology (microscopic ileum score). The relationship between pathology and the abundance of individual families colored by treatment group is demonstrated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muwonge, A., Karuppannan, A.K. & Opriessnig, T. Probiotics mediated gut microbiota diversity shifts are associated with reduction in histopathology and shedding of Lawsonia intracellularis. anim microbiome 3, 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-021-00084-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lawsonia intracellularis
  • Pigs
  • Probiotics
  • Vaccine
  • Microbial community
  • Metagenomics
\