Skip to main content

Vertically transmitted microbiome protects eggs from fungal infection and egg failure

Abstract

Background

Beneficial microbes can be vertically transmitted from mother to offspring in many organisms. In oviparous animals, bacterial transfer to eggs may improve egg success by inhibiting fungal attachment and infection from pathogenic microbes in the nest environment. Vertical transfer of these egg-protective bacteria may be facilitated through behavioral mechanisms such as egg-tending, but many species do not provide parental care. Thus, an important mechanism of vertical transfer may be the passage of the egg through the maternal cloaca during oviposition itself. In this study, we examined how oviposition affects eggshell microbial communities, fungal attachment, hatch success, and offspring phenotype in the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus, a species with no post-oviposition parental care.

Results

Relative to dissected eggs that did not pass through the cloaca, oviposited eggs had more bacteria and fewer fungal hyphae when examined with a scanning electron microscope. Using high throughput Illumina sequencing, we also found a difference in the bacterial communities of eggshells that did and did not pass through the cloaca, and the diversity of eggshell communities tended to correlate with maternal cloacal diversity only for oviposited eggs, and not for dissected eggs, indicating that vertical transmission of microbes is occurring. Further, we found that oviposited eggs had greater hatch success and led to larger offspring than those that were dissected.

Conclusions

Overall, our results indicate that female S. virgatus lizards transfer beneficial microbes from their cloaca onto their eggs during oviposition, and that these microbes reduce fungal colonization and infection of eggs during incubation and increase female fitness. Cloacal transfer of egg-protective bacteria may be common among oviparous species, and may be especially advantageous to species that lack parental care.

Background

Microbiomes associated with animals typically comprise diverse communities that live in and on their animal hosts [1, 2]. These microbes often confer benefits to their hosts, including nutritional supplementation and protection from pathogens, with the composition of the microbial community typically influenced by host behavior, health, and genetics [3, 4]. As studies of the microbiome expand, it is increasingly evident that microbiomes may play a key role in influencing the behavior and evolution of their animal hosts [2, 5, 6]. By impacting reproductive behavior or outcomes, microbiomes are increasingly appreciated as driving diversification and influencing speciation rates in diverse lineages [6].

Bacterial communities associated with hosts can affect individual fitness by diverse means of manipulating reproductive success: for example, they can influence mate choice, affect offspring survival, and behave as heritable phenotypes [4, 7]. In mammals, certain microbes are vertically transmitted through a variety of mechanisms: trans-ovarian and trans-uterine exchange, maternal-offspring contact during parturition, and via nursing and other post-natal interactions [8, 9]. However, both the mechanisms and consequences of vertical microbe transmission in oviparous animals, particularly reptiles, have received less attention [10].

Recent evidence suggests that egg-laying animals can pass microbes to their offspring throughout the developmental process [11,12,13,14]. The eggshell creates a barrier for microbial transmission to the embryo, but also an opportunity for host-microbe interactions via microbial protection of the egg from environmental pathogens. Infection from pathogens can lead to egg failure and decreased fitness, and host microbes can prevent those infections, increase hatch rates, and confer valuable benefits later in life [15,16,17]. Recent studies of house geckos and eastern fence lizards have shown that in ovo bacteria are present, likely transferred from the gut or ovarian microbiome during egg development [13, 18]. Studies of endangered sea turtles indicate that while infection with pathogenic strains of the fungus Fusarium is common in nests, so too is the presence of bacteria with antifungal properties, which could be deposited on eggs from the mother’s cloaca [17]. After oviposition, several species of birds have been observed transferring beneficial bacteria to their eggs through brood patches and preen oil, as well as other parental care behaviors [14, 19]. Birds also have the opportunity to transfer microbes directly to hatchlings by sharing their nest and food with their offspring [14, 19]. For species without parental care, like the majority of reptiles, passing of microbes must take place during egg development and oviposition.

Sceloporus virgatus, the striped plateau lizard, does not provide care for eggs after oviposition. This species is found primarily in oak-juniper scrub habitats of Arizona, New Mexico, and northern Mexico, and their reproduction is tied to the rain cycle. At the onset of the summer monsoon season (typically early July), gravid S. virgatus females bury eggs in soil nests (~ 6 cm deep [20]) and provide no further care. Throughout the ~ 8 week incubation period, eggs are exposed to soil-borne microbes at a time of warm, moist conditions, excellent for fungal growth. Given this challenge, selection may act to favor those females that provide antifungal protection to their eggs [15]. We hypothesize that, during oviposition, S. virgatus mothers transfer beneficial microbes from their cloaca onto the surface of their eggs, and that these microbes have antifungal properties that reduce infection by pathogenic fungi found in the nest environment [21].

Here we examine this hypothesis by comparing eggs that did and did not have opportunity to be inoculated with antifungal microbes from the mother’s cloaca; eggs that did not contact the cloaca were removed by dissection. We used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-throughput amplicon sequencing to compare microbial loads and community structure of oviposited and dissected eggshells to determine the influence of the maternal microbiome. To investigate the protective function of the microbiome, we further examined the effect of pathogen exposure to these two groups of eggs on fungal attachment rates, hatch success, and hatchling phenotype. We predicted that relative to oviposited eggs, dissected eggs would have (i) a lower bacterial load and higher fungal load, (ii) a different bacterial community structure, (iii) a weaker relationship to maternal cloacal microbial communities, (iv) higher fungal attachment rates, and (v) lower hatch success and resulting hatchling condition when challenged with potential fungal pathogens.

Methods

Sample collection

Gravid Sceloporus virgatus females were collected using a loop of fishing line tied to a variable length fishing pole from areas surrounding the American Museum of Natural History’s Southwestern Research Station (SWRS) in Cochise County, Arizona, USA between June 28 and July 1, 2019. Only females with > 62 mm snout-vent length (SVL) were used for this study. Lizard cloacae were swabbed in the field immediately after capture by gently inserting a sterile swab (BD ESwab™) into the cloaca and slowly rotating it. Microbes were eluted from the swab into an Amies solution and stored at − 80 °C until DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing.

Lizards were kept in large outdoor enclosures at SWRS until July 2, 2019 when they were shipped overnight in individual plastic containers on ice packs to the Weiss lab at the University of Puget Sound. On the day of arrival, females were swabbed again for comparison to the field swab and randomly assigned to treatment groups to generate two categories of eggs: dissected (n = 135 eggs) and oviposited (n = 103 eggs). Females providing dissected eggs (n = 12 females) were euthanized with a two-step procedure using buffered MS-222 [22]. Eggs were surgically removed from the oviduct with sterilized instruments. Females providing oviposited eggs (n = 12 females) were injected with 2 USP units of oxytocin. Eggs were handled with sterile gloves and instruments. All eggs were weighed and assigned haphazardly to one of five experimental groups across three experiments, as described below.

Experiment 1: describing microbial communities

The first experiment examined microbial load, community diversity, and community structure of eggs at Day 0 and Day 25 of incubation in soil. Eggs to be examined on Day 25 (approximately halfway through lab incubation) were individually buried in 50 ml cups of autoclaved vermiculite inoculated with a 1 g:10 ml soil:water slurry, made from soil collected at SWRS in order to expose eggs to natural environmental microbes (0.8 ml slurry/g vermiculite). Egg cups were covered in parafilm and incubated at 28 °C. After the appropriate time period, a small incision was made with sterile scissors at the tip of each egg, and the contents were expelled. A small portion (~ 15 mm2) of shell was saved at − 80 °C for amplicon sequencing, and the remaining shell was cut in half and prepared for imaging.

SEM imaging

Each eggshell piece was placed in 2 mL of fixative (2% paraformaldehyde, 2% gluteraldehyde, 2% DMSO, and 1x phosphate buffer solution (PBS)) for 2 h, then in 1x PBS for 48 h. Eggshells were dried with a standard SEM specimen drying procedure, mounted on individual stubs, and placed in an airtight container with desiccant overnight. Mounted specimens were sputter-coated with gold palladium and observed with the scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi S3400N Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope).

For Day 0 eggshells (dissected: n = 12, oviposited: n = 12), the average density of bacteria (the number of bacteria within the field of view) on the shell was quantified by scanning 30 randomly selected locations at 2.5 k x magnification per egg. At this stage, no fungi were identified on the eggshells. Day 25 eggshells (dissected: n = 11, oviposited: n = 9) were examined by scanning 15 randomly selected locations at 2.5 k x magnification to quantify the density of bacteria and fungal hyphae on the shell. Fewer locations were selected for imaging at Day 25 because bacteria were more abundant than on Day 0 and required less intensive scanning to find them. All observed bacteria were rod-shaped. We used two sample t-tests to determine whether dissected and oviposited eggshells differed in mean density of bacteria on Day 0 and on Day 25, as well as mean fungal hyphae on Day 25. Data were log-transformed as needed to meet test assumptions.

DNA extraction for amplicon sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from eggshell pieces and cloacal swabs via the Qiagen DNEasy©Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc). For the cloacal swab samples we used the manufacturer’s protocol for Purification of Total DNA from Animal Blood or Cells, with the optional pre-treatment for Gram-positive bacteria (lysis buffer incubation). An extraction blank was included in each extraction and processed as below for library preparation and sequencing. Eggshells were rinsed with sterile PBS, then a ~ 2 × 2 mm square of shell was prepared for DNA extraction. Samples were incubated in the optional lysis buffer for 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, Buffer AL and proteinase K were added to the tubes, and the shells were beat with sterile tungsten beads using a TissueLyser at 30 hz for 2 × 1 min. The samples were incubated at 56 °C for 90 min, while shaking at 500 RPM. From here, the extraction was completed according to the Purification of Total DNA from Animal Blood or Cells protocol, beginning at Step 3 (addition of pure ethanol). Extraction blanks for eggshell extractions included 200 uL of sterile PBS, as the sterile forceps and scissors that were used to subsample the shells were dipped into the PBS prior to the extraction procedure, as well as extraction kit blanks as above. DNA in all samples and blanks was quantified via Qubit prior to processing.

Illumina library prep

A two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process was used to amplify the 16 s rRNA gene V4 region in each sample [23, 24]. PCR1 utilized 515F/806R primer pairs. Six variations of the primers were pooled, each with a 0–5 base pair (bp) shift, linked to locus-specific sequences and a consensus sequence with a 2 bp linker [24]. PCR1 had a 15 uL reaction volume, containing 7.5 uL Phusion Flash High Fidelity Master Mix (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA), 0.15 uL of the forward and reverse primers, 0.75 uL molecular grade Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, 20 mg/mL), 5.45 uL purified water, and 1 uL template DNA. The thermal cycling protocol was: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s; 28 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 1 s, annealing at 57 °C for 5 s, and extension at 72 °C for 20 s; then one final extension at 72 °C for 60 s [24]. PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel using 10x Sybr Green (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA). All iterations of PCR1 included a positive control, containing Serratia genomic DNA, and a negative control, containing only purified water and no DNA template. A mock community for bacteria from BEI Resources (ATCC, Manassas, VA) was processed in parallel to assess potential primer bias and evaluate the relationship of observed and expected read number (see [24]).

PCR1 was performed in triplicate, and all replicates were pooled for PCR2, which extended the amplicons with the sample-specific barcodes. Samples (including positive controls) that showed strong bands in at least two of three PCR1 replicates were diluted 1:4 in purified water before being used as template DNA in PCR2. Samples with faint or no bands in at least two of three PCR1 replicates were used directly for DNA template in PCR2. In addition to pooling replicates of the negative controls, negative controls from different PCR1 runs were further pooled to minimize the number of samples sent for sequencing. Because of this, some iterations of PCR2 contained a pooled PCR1 negative control, and some contained a new PCR2 negative control with purified water instead of DNA template.

PCR2 had a reaction volume of 20 uL containing 10 uL Phusion Flash High Fidelity Master Mix, 0.24 uL BSA, 8.01 uL of purified water, 0.75 uL of unique barcoded primer pairs (supplied by IBest Genomics Core, University of Idaho; see [24]), and 1 uL of template DNA. The thermal cycling protocol was the same as the protocol for PCR1, except with an annealing temperature of 51 °C. PCR2 was only run for 8 cycles (for a total of 36 cycles total). PCR2 products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel with 10x Sybr Green. We confirmed that each sample had undergone a band shift compared to PCR1, indicative of attachment of barcode primers. Each sample band was given a score from 0 to 5 based on band intensity; these scores were then used to determine pool volume for each sample. Samples were shipped to IBest Genomic Core for purification and sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. All negative controls and mock communities were included in the sequencing process, but positive controls were not.

Illumina raw data processing and analysis

Sequences were received demultiplexed, with adapters and primers removed. Quality analysis for each sample was performed using FastQC [25] and those results were consolidated using MulitQC [26]. Mean quality scores and length distribution for the whole dataset was manually inspected and used to determine a cutoff length of 265 bp for forward reads and 185 bp for reverse reads. Samples were then processed in R v3.1.6 via the DADA2 [27] pipeline. Samples were trimmed as described above and filtered with a max expected error of 2. An average of 78% of reads were kept in all experimental samples after processing.

Taxonomic classification of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was performed through the assignTaxonomy function, using the Silva database [28], release 132. Potential contaminants were removed with the Decontam package [29], using the “prevalence” method with a threshold of 0.1. Control samples (n = 23), including experimental controls, extraction blanks, and PCR negatives were used for comparison. Any ASV that had fewer than 27 reads across all samples was discarded, based on the inspection of the mock community, and read numbers were log transformed.

Once samples had been processed, the phyloseq package [30] was used to organize and store data of different types for analysis. Shannon diversity index values were calculated using phyloseq (estimate_richness function). We assessed whether the Shannon diversity and richness of the cloacal microbiome differed before and after lizards were shipped to the lab using paired t-tests, and between females that would go on to be either dissected or induced to oviposit on the day of egg acquisition using two sample t-tests. We assessed whether diversity and richness of eggshell microbiomes differed based on egg type (dissected and oviposited) at Day 0 and Day 25 via two-sample t-tests when possible and Wilcoxon tests if data did not meet parametric assumptions. Response variables were log transformed when needed to meet the assumption of equal variance. We looked for a relationship between maternal cloacal diversity and Day 0 eggshell diversity using Pearson’s correlation tests; only animals that had both a Day 0 eggshell and an available cloacal swab were included in this analysis.

Pairwise distances between samples were calculated by the vegan package [31] using Bray-Curtis distances, and these distances were then used to generate non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots. Dispersion between explanatory variables of interest was first tested with the betadisper function from the vegan package and a PERMANOVA test was performed to compare community composition (Adonis function from the vegan package). All plots were made with the GGplot2 package [32].

Experiment 2: fungal attachment assays

To test whether the eggshell microbiome inhibits fungal attachment, fungal attachment assays were performed on dissected and oviposited eggshells after 9 d of incubation in sterile vermiculite mixed with sterile water (0.8 mL/g). Eggshell halves were put into 1 ml suspensions of Aspergillus protuberus (1.04 × 106 hyphae/mL) or Neocosmospora rubicola (2.48 × 106 hyphae/mL) and incubated at room temperature for 48 h. These fungi had been previously cultured from soil samples taken from areas where natural S. virgatus nest burrows would be constructed, and are known to be pathogenic in other systems [33, 34].

After incubation, shells were rinsed with deionized water and prepared for SEM as described above. The density of fungi attached to the shell surface were quantified at 2.5 k x magnification per egg. Counts were performed on 15 random locations across each shell piece and the density of fungal hyphae on dissected and oviposited eggs were compared. Hyphal attachment of A. protuberus was non-normal, even following standard transformations, and was compared across egg types with a Mann-Whitney U test. Log-transformed N. rubicola attachment was analyzed with a two sample t-test.

Experiment 3: hatch success

The final experiment considered hatch success of dissected and oviposited eggs that were incubated in either sterile (dissected: n = 42; oviposited: n = 31) or fungal-inoculated (dissected: n = 41; oviposited: n = 30) vermiculite. Each mother had eggs in both incubation conditions. Eggs were individually buried in 50 ml cups of sterile vermiculite moistened with 0.8 mL/g of either sterile water or fungal suspension (described below). Egg cups were covered in parafilm and incubated at 28 °C.

The fungal suspension used to challenge the S. virgatus eggs included 9 strains of fungi originally cultured from failed S. virgatus eggs with visible fungal infection (Table 1). Plates with complete lawns of each strain were flooded with a sterile 0.01% Tween solution, and a sterile spreader was used to dislodge fungal spores and hyphae into the liquid. The concentration of each fungal solution was determined with a hemocytometer and adjusted to ~ 1 X 108 cells/mL of solution, and then the nine fungi were combined into a single fungal suspension.

Table 1 Fungal strains included in the fungal suspension used for egg incubation

At Day 25 of incubation, eggs were unearthed, examined for viability, swabbed for culturing of bacteria and other experimental work (not included herein), and re-buried. Eggs were scored as non-viable if they were completely desiccated and/or overgrown with fungus. Beginning at Day 36 of incubation, eggs were checked daily for hatchlings. We scored hatch success of eggs, and hatch time (i.e., incubation period), body mass, and SVL of hatchlings.

The effect of egg type (dissected vs. oviposited) and incubation environment (sterile vs. fungal-inoculated) on viability at Day 25 and hatch success were examined using a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with a binomial (logit) error distribution and mother ID as a random factor. Viability at Day 25 and hatch success were calculated in R with the cbind(x,y) function, where x was the number of non-viable or failed eggs and y was the number of viable or hatched eggs. The effects of egg type and incubation environment on hatchling phenotype were examined using linear mixed models with mother ID as a random factor. We used the lme4 package [35] to run the models and used the lmerTest package [36], as needed, to calculate p-values.

The above experiment followed up on a preliminary study of females collected June 27 to July 4, 2017 (minimum SVL = 58 mm). These females (n = 14) were kept in large outdoor enclosures until July 8, 2017 when eggs were acquired by dissection or oviposition, as described above. All eggs from the 2017 study were incubated individually in 50 ml cups at 30 °C in the presence of natural environmental microbes by moistening vermiculite with a 1 g:10 ml soil:water slurry made from soil collected at SWRS (0.8 ml slurry/g vermiculite); eggs were incubated in the Arnold lab at the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. As above, we scored hatch success of eggs, and hatch time, body mass, and SVL of hatchlings. Data were analyzed similarly to above with the exclusion of an incubation environment factor. This study initially included a group of females (n = 8) treated with a 3 d series of oral antibiotic (0.03 ml/d of compounded 2 mg/ml enrofloxacin) in an attempt to reduce and alter the cloacal microbiome; however, the treatment was largely unsuccessful (see Additional File 1) so eggs from those females are not included here.

Results

SEM imaging

The density of bacteria observed on eggshell surfaces (Fig. 1a) differed between egg types on both Day 0 (t = − 5.81, df = 22, p < < 0.001) and Day 25 (t = − 6.82, df = 18, p < < 0.001). As predicted, the average density of eggshell bacteria was significantly lower on dissected eggs than on oviposited eggs at both time points (Fig. 2). Fungal hyphae were not observed on eggshells at Day 0, but were present at Day 25 (Fig. 1b), with significantly more hyphae on dissected eggs than on oviposited eggs (t = 3.01, df = 18, p = 0.008; Fig. 3).

Fig. 1
figure1

A Scanning electron microscope images of rod-shaped bacteria and fungal hyphae on S. virgatus eggshells. B Fungal hyphae cover the eggshell in a branched structure that spreads across the surface. Both images taken at 2.5 k magnification

Fig. 2
figure2

The mean (±SE) density of bacteria (per 1800 μm2) on S. virgatus eggshells at Day 0 and Day 25 of incubation in soil slurry. Bacteria were significantly less dense on dissected eggs than on oviposited eggs on both days (p < < 0.001). Counts were made via SEM by randomly selecting locations on the eggshell surface and measuring the density of bacteria at 2.5 k magnification

Fig. 3
figure3

Mean (±SE) density (per 1800 μm2) of fungal hyphae found on S. virgatus eggshells on Day 25 of incubation. The density of hyphae was significantly greater on dissected eggs than on oviposited eggs (p = 0.008)

Cloacal microbial communities

The cloacal microbiome of gravid females did not change significantly from the time they were collected in the field in AZ to the time they were sampled in the laboratory (Table 2). On the day of egg acquisition, the cloacal microbiome of females to be dissected and females to be induced to oviposit differed in alpha diversity (t = 4.11, df = 15, p = 0.001) and richness (t = 3.90, df = 15, p = 0.001; Table 3). This pattern was unexpected as the females were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Given the pattern was for dissected females to have more diverse cloacal microbiomes, and our prediction is that the eggs from these females will have less diverse eggshell microbiomes, the difference detected here is conservative, working against our ability to find the predicted pattern. The two groups of females did not differ in cloacal microbiome dispersion (F = 0.14, df = 1,15, p = 0.716) or composition (F = 1.69, df = 1,15, p = 0.161).

Table 2 Effect of shipping on cloacal microbiome of S. virgatus females
Table 3 Diversity metrics from laboratory swabs of S. virgatus female cloacae from each treatment group

Overall, the cloacal community was dominated by Enterobacteriaceae, which makes up 67.95% ± 7.2% of the communities on average, on the day of egg acquisition. The next most abundant taxa was Helicobacteraceae, making up an average of 20.1% ± 7.2% of reads on average. Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Corynebacteriaceae were all between 1 and 4% on average, and no other families made up more than 1% of the reads.

Eggshell microbial communities

Microbial richness and community diversity were significantly lower on dissected eggshells than on oviposited eggshells on Day 0 (richness: t = − 2.39, df = 14, p = 0.031; Shannon: t = − 2.60, df = 14, p = 0.021; Fig. 4a-b). These differences were not observed at Day 25 of incubation (richness: t = − 0.05, df = 12, p = 0.959; Shannon: W = 21, p = 0.710).

Fig. 4
figure4

A Mean observed richness (±SE) and B Mean Shannon diversity index values (±SE) for dissected and oviposited S. virgatus eggs. Communities were sampled at Day 0 and Day 25 of incubation in soil slurry. Non-metric multidimensional scaling plots were created by using Bray Curtis distance to calculate pairwise distances based on community composition on C) Day 0 and D) Day 25. Three dimensions were used to calculate distances, but only the most influential two are pictured here

Beta diversity was visualized through non-metric multidimensional scaling of pairwise Bray-Curtis distances with 3 dimensions to minimize stress. The most influential dimensions are visualized in Fig. 4c-d. There was no visual separation of the two egg types on Day 0 (Fig. 4c), but there is at Day 25 (Fig. 4d). The dispersion of the groups on Day 0 was not different between egg types (F = 0.23, df = 1,14, p = 0.642), and the samples of a given egg type were not more similar to one another than they were to samples in the other group (F = 0.75, df = 1,14, p = 0.951). On Day 25, the dispersion between groups was similar (F = 0.49, df = 1,12, p = 0.499), but the composition on the two types of eggs showed trends of separation (F = 1.40, df = 1,12, p = 0.067). This indicates that at Day 25 of incubation, the eggshells within each treatment group tended to be more similar to one another than they were to eggshells in the other group.

We also detected differences in the composition of microbial communities associated with oviposited and dissected eggshells (Fig. 5). The largest component on Day 0 were Enterobacteriaceae, making up an average of 56.2 ± 9.3% of all reads from dissected eggs and 49.2 ± 8.4% of total reads from oviposited eggs. The next most abundant taxa on the dissected eggs was Tannerellaceae (7.1 ± 1.7% of reads). For the oviposited shells, the second most abundant taxa was Lachnospiraceae (12.6 ± 4.5% of reads).

Fig. 5
figure5

Percent composition of bacterial families in eggshell communities from eggs that were either dissected from S. virgatus females or oviposited. Communities were sampled immediately after egg acquisition and on Day 25 of incubation in soil slurry. Each vertical bar represents a different eggshell; labels are identification numbers for the female which provided the egg. Colored portions of the bars represent the relative abundance of the top ten most abundant taxa; the remaining taxa were combined into the “other” category. The y-axis indicates the percent composition of total reads for that sample

By Day 25 of incubation, oviposited eggs still had an average of 43.3 ± 13.7% of reads representing Enterobacteriaceae, with some samples having up to 97.7% of their total reads falling into that family. For dissected eggs, Enterobacteriaceae represented only 13.7 ± 7.0% of reads, and the highest percentage of Enterobacteriaceae for any given dissected egg was only 47.9%. Instead, the most prominent family for those samples was Planococcaceae (43.2 ± 13.7% of reads; maximum of 88.4%). Only one dissected egg shell contained Planococcaceae on Day 0 (41.7% of reads).

Cloacal swab and eggshell community comparison

We compared the microbiome of maternal cloacae to that of eggshells at Day 0, predicting a positive relationship for oviposited eggs and no relationship for dissected eggs. For oviposited eggs, there were trends for positive relationships between cloacal and eggshell richness (r = 0.73, df = 4, p = 0.102, Fig. 6a) and alpha diversity (r = 0.75, df = 4, p = 0.089, Fig. 6b). These trends were not present for dissected eggs (richness: r = 0.04, df = 4, p = 0.940, Fig. 6a; alpha diversity: r = 0.08, df = 4, p = 0.877, Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure6

Correlation of A) observed richness and B) Shannon diversity index of S. virgatus eggshell bacteria relative to that of the mother’s cloaca sampled on the same day. Correlations are not significant for dissected eggs (p = 0.940, p = 0.877) but are nearly so for oviposited eggs (p = 0.102, p = 0.087)

Fungal attachment

Following a 48 h incubation with Aspergillus protuberus or Neocosmospora rubicola, fungal hyphae were identified on both dissected and oviposited eggshells (Fig. 7a) and in some cases were tightly associated with bacteria (Fig. 7b). For both fungal species, we found significantly more hyphae on dissected eggs than on oviposited eggs (A. protuberus: W = 62.5, p = 0.012; N. rubicola: t = 2.75, df = 15, p = 0.015; Fig. 7c).

Fig. 7
figure7

A Hyphal attachment of Aspergillus protuberus on an eggshell of S. virgatus at 270X magnification. B At 2.5 k magnification, we find hyphae covered in rod-shaped bacteria that are roughly 2 μm in length. C Mean (± SE) density of fungal hyphae (per 22,800 μm2) on dissected and oviposited S. virgatus eggs exposed to the fungal species A. protuberus and Neocosmospora rubicola. Fungal hyphae were significantly more dense on dissected eggs than oviposited eggs, for both A. protuberus (p = 0.012) and N. rubicola (p = 0.015)

Hatch success and offspring phenotype

For the 2017 eggs, which were all exposed to naturally occurring microbes via a soil-inoculated vermiculite, hatch success was significantly lower for dissected eggs (42.3%) than oviposited eggs (86.9%; family: binomial, link: logit, z = − 4.19, p < < 0.001). Hatchlings that emerged from dissected eggs had similar hatch times (t = 1.21, p = 0.249) but were 24% smaller in mass (t = − 9.02, p < < 0.001) and 8% smaller in length (t = − 7.15, p < < 0.001) than hatchlings from oviposited eggs (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure8

Mean (± SE) A incubation time, B body mass, and C SVL of hatchlings that emerged from dissected and oviposited S. virgatus eggs. In 2017, eggs were incubated in vermiculite inoculated with a soil slurry from the native range of S. virgatus. In 2019, eggs were incubated in vermiculite inoculated either with a fungal suspension derived from fungus that had infected failed S. virgatus eggs, or with sterile water. The dashed lined separates results from 2017 and 2019. Hatchlings from dissected and oviposited eggs did not differ in incubation size, but did significantly differ in mass and length

For the 2019 eggs, at Day 25 of incubation, oviposited eggs had 100% viability, whereas dissected eggs had 73% viability. Viability of dissected eggs depended on incubation environment, with significantly higher viability in sterile (85%) than fungal-inoculated (61.0%) media (family: binomial, link: logit, z = − 2.36, p = 0.018). Hatch success was significantly lower in dissected eggs (59.8%) than in oviposited eggs (89.5%; family: binomial, link: logit, z = − 3.50, p < 0.001), whereas incubation environment did not significantly impact hatch success and was removed from the final model based on AIC.

Of hatched offspring, the effect of egg type on hatch time depended on the incubation environment (t = 2.45, p = 0.017, Fig. 8a). However, analyses investigating the effect of egg type in only sterile conditions and, separately, in only fungal-inoculated conditions both showed no significant pattern (sterile: t = 0.02, p = 0.982; fungal: t = − 0.95, p = 0.359, Fig. 8a).

As in 2017, hatchlings emerging from dissected eggs in 2019 were significantly smaller than those emerging from oviposited eggs, both in terms of body mass and length (Fig. 8b-c). Hatchlings from dissected eggs were 12% lighter than those from oviposited eggs (t = 2.42 p = 0.025; Fig. 8b), but hatchling body mass was unaffected by incubation environment (t = 0.26, p = 0.795) and the interaction of egg type and incubation environment (t = 1.40, p = 0.165). The effect of egg type on hatchling SVL depended on the incubation environment (t = 3.16, p = 0.002, Fig. 8c). Hatchlings from dissected eggs were 6% smaller in length than those from oviposited eggs in sterile conditions (t = 5.21, p = 0.001) but hatchlings from the two egg types did not differ in SVL when incubated in fungal-inoculated conditions (t = 1.29, p = 0.218). Note that mothers who produced dissected and oviposited eggs did not differ in size (mass: t = − 0.76, df = 20, p = 0.456, SVL: t = − 0.89, df = 20, p = 0.382).

Discussion

Compared to oviposited eggs, dissected S. virgatus eggs that did not pass through the maternal cloaca had a lower bacterial density, lower bacterial diversity, a distinct microbial community, higher fungal density mid-incubation, and higher fungal attachment. These microbial differences appear to have an effect on female fitness by influencing egg viability, hatch success, and hatchling phenotype.

Amplicon sequencing revealed that microbiome on the eggshell of oviposited eggs is composed mostly of Enterobacteriaceae at both Day 0 and Day 25. Many members of this group have antifungal capabilities; in particular Serratia strains can prevent fungal growth and infection in various plant and animal systems [37,38,39]. In comparison, while dissected eggs began with a large proportion of Enterobacteriaceae on Day 0 (when no fungus was found), by Day 25 they had been largely colonized by other bacterial strains from the incubation environment, and they had higher fungal density. One of the key functions of the microbiome in other systems is to prevent pathogenic incursion through competition or direct intervention [40,41,42,43], and it is likely that one of those mechanisms is at work here.

The cloacal microbial community of S. virgatus lizards is also largely dominated by Enterobacteriaceae [21] and, among oviposited eggs, the diversity of eggshell microbes tended to correlate to the diversity of the maternal cloaca. These patterns, along with significantly higher bacterial loads on oviposited eggs relative to dissected eggs, support the hypothesis that microbes are transmitted directly from cloaca to egg during oviposition. Maternal transmission of microbes is a well-studied and important part of animal development, but such transmission for egg-laying animals has been less clear [8, 44]. Birds transfer microbes to their eggs, but often through nest tending behavior, rather than during oviposition [14, 19]. Sarmiento-Ramirez (2014) found sea turtle eggshells populated by some bacteria that also have been isolated from cloacae, although no direct comparison was made [17]. There is also evidence that in-ovo microbes can be passed down during egg development, and generally correlate to the maternal gut microbiome [13].

The microbiome has been shown to be highly localized in general, and in squamates specifically [10, 45, 46]. It is possible that in this system the cloaca acts as a bottleneck, to ensure that only specific beneficial bacteria are deposited upon eggs. The cloacae of wild S. virgatus have relatively low microbial diversity compared to other vertebrates [21]. This is unusual, as the cloaca is the terminus of the gastrointestinal and reproductive tracts, and thus has more often been shown to have higher diversity [45, 46]. This pattern could indicate positive selection for this particular cohort of bacteria, which offer benefits to the eggs during development.

One of those benefits appears to be preventing fungal attachment to eggs, which is a common cause of egg failure in many oviparous animals [47, 48]. We found that, along with higher bacterial loads, oviposited eggs were less likely to host fungus, even when incubated in an environment inoculated with fungus. Bacteria have been shown to prevent fungal growth in other systems, particularly soil bacteria that protect plant roots from fungal pathogens, and bacteria found on amphibian skin [37, 42, 49]. Generally, bacteria can disrupt fungal growth by breaking down mycelia through production of hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinase or protease [38].

As a further consequence of the bacterial and fungal attachment differences between dissected and oviposited eggs, dissected eggs had lower mid-incubation viability -- 15% lower than oviposited eggs when incubated in sterile conditions and 39% lower than oviposited eggs when incubated in fungal-inoculated conditions. Hatch success was also significantly lower in dissected eggs than in oviposited eggs, and the magnitude of the effect tended to increase with increased exposure to environmental pathogens. The effect of dissection on hatch success was a 24% reduction in sterile conditions, 45% reduction in fungal-inoculated conditions, and 52% reduction in soil-inoculated conditions. These patterns suggest that environmental pathogens are killing the eggs, and that maternal microbes offer protection.

Hatchlings that emerged from dissected eggs were significantly smaller than hatchlings from oviposited eggs. Smaller body size was not due to earlier hatching, which may occur in response to egg infection [50,51,52]. Rather, reduced size may be due to metabolic shifts in response to embryonic stress [53, 54]. As hatchling body size is likely to correlate to survival [55, 56], smaller hatchlings may be costly to female reproductive success. Thus, the vertically transmitted maternal microbiome may benefit female fitness both by increasing hatch success and by increasing the survival of those hatchlings.

Other mechanisms may also be at play. For instance, beneficial host-generated compounds secreted from cloacal glands [57] could be added to the eggshell during the final passage from oviduct to external environment, or perhaps a mechanical stimulus triggers some key embryonic developmental processes. These or other hypotheses could explain why dissection tended to reduce hatch success even in sterile environments. Though this pattern was not statistically significant, it suggests additional benefits occur during oviposition, beyond protection from fungal pathogens. None of these possibilities preclude antifungal protections, and indeed multiple influences on hatch success are likely to exist in any one system. What is evident here is that there is a clear relationship between oviposition, bacterial load, and offspring success.

Conclusion

We have found compelling evidence for the vertical transmission of microbes with antifungal capabilities from the cloaca of S. virgatus females to their eggshells. Observational data using SEM show increased bacterial load and decreased fungal attachment on eggs that were laid via oviposition compared to those that were dissected. Experimental manipulation showed that this coincided with increased hatch success and offspring quality, while amplicon sequencing data confirmed that the composition of the eggshell microbiome is consistent with the core cloacal microbiome, and contains microbes known to have antifungal properties. We are currently working to quantify the antifungal effects by directly challenging bacteria found in the maternal cloaca with pathogenic environmental fungi in vitro. Next steps also include further examining the mechanism behind maternal transmission, as well as studies to document consequences of fungal infection in natural nests. This current study can be expanded to other species that face similar challenges to egg success, especially those that lack parental care, and could offer a new avenue for conservation and restoration research for other oviparous animals.

Availability of data and materials

The sequences supporting the conclusions of this study, including biological samples, sampling controls, extraction controls, PCR controls, and mock communities, are available in the sequence read archive of NCBI (BioProject PRJNA687039, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/687039, SAMN17131990–17132125). R scripts for processing sequences and for all statistical analyses used in this study are included as Additional files 2, 3, 4, and 5. The taxonomy assignments for all ASVs, following processing and removal of contaminants, are in Additional file 6. Community composition data for cloacal and eggshell samples are included in Additional file 7.

Abbreviations

ASV:

Amplicon sequence variant

NMDS:

Non-metric multidimensional scaling

PBS:

Phosphate buffer solution

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

SVL:

Snout to vent length

SWRS:

Southwestern Research Station

References

  1. 1.

    Gilbert S, Sapp J, Tauber A. A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol. 2012;87:17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McFall-Ngai M, et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. PNAS. 2013;110(9):3229–36. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218525110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ley R, Peterson D, Gordon J. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell. 2006;124(4):837–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shropshire J, Bordenstein S. Speciation by symbiosis: the microbiome and behavior. MBio. 2016;7(2):e01785–15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01785-15.

  5. 5.

    Archie E, Theis K. Animal behavior meets microbial ecology. Anim Behav. 2011;82(3):425–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hird S. Evolutionary biology needs wild microbiomes. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00725.

  7. 7.

    Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32(5):723–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Funkhouser L, Bordenstein S. Mom knows best: the universality of maternal microbial transmission. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(8):e1001631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001631.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Moeller A, Suzuki T, Phifer-Rixey M, Nachman M. Transmission modes of the mammalian gut microbiota. Science. 2018;362(6413):453–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7164.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kohl K, Brun A, Magallanes M, Brinkerhoff J, Laspuir A, Acosta J, et al. Gut microbial ecology of lizards: insights into diversity in the wild, effects of captivity, variation across gut regions and transmission. Mol Ecol. 2017;26(4):1175–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ding J, Dai R, Yang L, He C, Xu K, Liu S, et al. Inheritance and establishment of gut microbiota in chickens. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01967.

  12. 12.

    Salem H, Florez L, Gerardo N, Kaltenpoth M. An out-of-body experience: the extracellular dimension for the transmission of mutualistic bacteria in insects. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282(1804):20142957. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Trevelline B, MacLeod K, Knutie S, Langkilde T, Kohl K. In ovo microbial communities: a potential mechanism for the initial acquisition of gut microbiota among oviparous birds and lizards. Biol Lett. 2018;14(7):20180225. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    van Veelen, HPJ, Salles, JF, Tieleman, BI. Microbiome assembly of avian eggshells and their potential as transgenerational carriers of maternal microbiota.  ISME J. 2018;12(5):1375–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0067-3.

  15. 15.

    Cook M, Beissinger S, Tarnzos G, Rodriguez R, Arendt W. Microbial infection affects egg viability and incubation behavior in tropical passerine. Behav Ecol. 2005;16(1):30–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Peralta-Sánchez JM, Martín-Platero AM, Wegener-Parfrey L, Martínez-Bueno M, Rodríguez-Ruano S, Navas-Molina JA, et al. Bacterial density rather than diversity correlates with hatching success across different avian species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy022.

  17. 17.

    Sarmiento-Ramirez J, van der Voort M, Raaijmakers J, Dieguez-Uribeondo J. Unravelling the microbiome of eggs of the endangered sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata identifies bacteria with activity against the emerging pathogen Fusarium falciforme. PlosOne. 2014;9(4):e95206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Singh BR, Singh V, Ebibeni N, Singh RK. Maternal transfer of bacteria to eggs of common house gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus). J Microbiol Res. 2014;42(2):78–85.

  19. 19.

    Giraudeau M, Czirjak GA, Duval C, Bretagnolle V, Gutierrez C, Heeb P. An experimental test in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) of the effect of incubation and maternal preen oil on eggshell microbial load. J Ornithol. 2014;155(3):671–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1050-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Andrews R. Evolution of viviparity in squamate reptiles (Sceloporus spp.): a variant of the cold-climate model. J Zool. 2000;250(2):243–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01075.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Martin MO, Gilman FR, Weiss SL. Sex-specific asymmetry within the cloacal microbiota of the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Symbiosis. 2010;51(1):97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-010-0078-y.

  22. 22.

    Conroy C, Papenfuss T, Parker J, Hahn N. Use of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS222) for euthanasia of reptiles. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci JAALAS. 2009;48(1):28–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    U’Ren JM, Lutzoni F, Miadlikowska J, Zimmerman NB, Carbone I, May G, et al. Host availability drives distributions of fungal endophytes in the imperilled boreal realm. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3(10):1430–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0975-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Taylor MJ, Mannan RW, U’Ren JM, Garber NP, Gallery RE, Arnold AE. Age-related variation in the oral microbiome of urban Cooper’s hawks (Accipiter cooperii). BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1413-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Andrews S. Babraham bioinformatics - FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data; 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 17 Sep 2020

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S. DADA2: high resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McMurdie P, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61217.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: community ecology package; 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 17 Sep 2020

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2009. Springer-Verlag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3.

  33. 33.

    Borsa B, Özgün G, Houbraken J, Ökmen F. The first case of persistent vaginitis due to Aspergillus protuberus in an immunocompetent patient. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49(1):130–4. https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.8397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zheng F, Xu G, Zheng F, Ding X, Xie C. Neocosmospora rubicola causing stem rot of Pitaya (Hylocereus costaricensis) in China. Plant Dis. 2018;102(12):2653. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-17-1469-PDN.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv14065823 Stat. 2014; http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

  36. 36.

    Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RH. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.

  37. 37.

    Dhar Purkayastha G, Mangar P, Saha A, Saha D. Evaluation of the biocontrol efficacy of a Serratia marcescens strain indigenous to tea rhizosphere for the management of root rot disease in tea. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191761.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gutierrez-Roman MI, Holguin-Melendez F, Dunn MF, Guillen-Navarro K, Huerta-Palacios G. Antifungal activity of Serratia marcesencs CFFSUR-B2 purified chitinolytic enzymes and prodigiosin against Mucrosphaerella fijiensis, causal agent of black Sigatoka in banana (Musa spp.). BioControl. 2015;60(4):565–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9655-6.

  39. 39.

    Kalbe C, Marten P, Berg G. Strains of the genus Serratia as beneficial rhizobacteria of oilseed rape with antifungal properties. Microbiol Res. 1996;151(4):433–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-5013(96)80014-0.

  40. 40.

    Harris RN, Brucker RM, Walke JB, Becker MH, Schwantes CR, Flaherty DC, et al. Skin microbes on frogs prevent morbidity and mortality caused by a lethal skin fungus. ISME J. 2009;3(7):818–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    van der Waaij D, Vries JB, der Wees JL. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. J Hyg (Lond). 1971;69:405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Walke JB, Belden LK. Harnessing the microbiome to prevent fungal infections: lessons from amphibians. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(9):e1005796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005796.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhang C, Derrien M, Levenez F, Brazeilles R, Ballal S, Kim J, et al. Ecological robustness of the gut microbiota in response to ingestion of transient food-borne microbes. ISME J. 2016;10(9):2235–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    van Veelen HPJ, Salles JF, Tieleman BI. Microbiome assembly of avian eggshells and their potential as transgenerational carriers of maternal microbiota. ISME J. 2018;12(5):1375–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0067-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Colston T, Noonan B, Jackson C. Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract of Agkistrodon piscivorus, the cottonmouth snake. PlosOne. 2015;10(6):e0128793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128793.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Videvall E, Strandh M, Engelbrecht A, Cloete S, Cornwallis CK. Measuring the gut microbiome in birds: Comparison of faecal and cloacal sampling. Mol Ecol Resour. 2018;18(3):424–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12744

  47. 47.

    Clutton-Brock T. The evolution of parental care. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691206981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    D’Alba L, Shawkey M. Mechanisms of antimicrobial defense in avian eggs. J Ornithol. 2015;156(S1):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1226-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Schoonbeek H, Jacquat-Bovet A-C, Mascher F, Métraux J-P. Oxalate-degrading bacteria can protect Arabidopsis thaliana and crop plants against Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 2007;20:1535–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gomez-Mestre I, Touchon J, Warkentin K. Amphibian embryo and parental defenses and a larval predator reduce egg mortality from water mold. Ecology. 2006;87(10):2570–81. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2570:AEAPDA]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Moreira PL, Barata M. Egg mortality and early embryo hatching caused by fungal infection of Iberian rock lizard ( Lacerta monticola ) clutches. :8.

  52. 52.

    Wedekind C. Induced hatching to avoid infectious egg disease in whitefish. Curr Biol. 2002;12(1):69–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00627-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mcmillen I, Robinson J. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(2):571–633. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00053.2003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Saino N, Romano M, Ferrari RP, Martinelli R, Møller AP. Stressed mothers lay eggs with high corticosterone levels which produce low-quality offspring. J Exp Zoolog A Comp Exp Biol. 2005;303A(11):998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.224.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Civantos E, Forsman A. Determinants of survival in juvenile Psammodromus algirus lizards. Oecologia. 2000;124(1):64–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050025.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Warner DA, Andrews RM. Laboratory and field experiments identify sources of variation in phenotypes and survival of hatchling lizards: phenotypes and survival of hatchling lizards. Biol J Linn Soc. 2002;76(1):105–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb01718.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Trauth SE, Cooper WE, Vitt LJ, Perrill SA. Cloacal anatomy of the broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps, with a description of a female pheromonal gland. Herpetologica. 1987;43:458–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank SWRS staff, Michal Morrison-Kerr, Amy Replogle, and Ming-Min Lee for logistical support, and numerous SWRS volunteers for help in the field, especially Madi Rittinger, Lauren Roberts, and Dani Koelling. Olivia Perotti isolated fungal strains from failed eggs, and Emily Bessen, Liz Bowman, Tiare Gill, Shuzo Oita, Sarah Sanz, and Marley Weiss assisted in lab work. Cristina Banks-Leite gave statistical advice.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (1755408), the University of Puget Sound, and the University of Arizona. Data collection and analyses performed by the IBEST Genomics Resources Core at the University of Idaho were supported in part by NIH COBRE grant P30GM103324.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MEB conducted Illumina lab work and analyses, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript. GE conducted field and lab work, focusing on the SEM imaging and fungal attachment assays. HHG conducted field and lab work, focusing on egg viability, hatch success, and hatchling characteristics. MOM made substantial contributions to the conception of the project and gave input throughout. AEA contributed resources to the 2017 field work, and contributed resources and training for all Illumina lab work and analyses. SLW conceived the project; was involved in all aspects of experimental design, field work, and analyses; contributed resources; and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Weiss.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The work was permitted by the University of Puget Sound IACUC (PS16002, PS18002) and Arizona Game and Fish collecting permit (SP590934, SP649069).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Effect of antibiotic treatment on the cloacal microbiome of female Sceloporus virgatus.

Additional file 2.

R script used to process sequences from 2017 samples discussed in Additional file 1

Additional file 3.

R script used to process all sequences from 2019 samples discussed in the main text.

Additional file 4.

R script for statistical analyses of all data derived from sequencing: richness, Shannon diversity, beta diversity, and differential abundance analyses.

Additional file 5.

R script for statistical analyses of all experimental data: SEM analyses, fungal attachment assays, hatch success, and hatchling phenotype.

Additional file 6.

Taxonomy assignments for all ASV’s.

Additional file 7.

Community composition data for cloacal and eggshell samples.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunker, M.E., Elliott, G., Heyer-Gray, H. et al. Vertically transmitted microbiome protects eggs from fungal infection and egg failure. anim microbiome 3, 43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-021-00104-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antifungal bacteria
  • Cloaca
  • Eggshell
  • Fitness
  • Illumina
  • Lizard
  • Microbiome
  • Scanning electron microscopy
  • Sceloporus